Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post

Because it's impossible to reach a $2500 win goal playing 25-cents video poker without voodoo that gives you multiple royals between bathroom breaks.

Kewlj asks: "..Alan do you benefit in any way by supporting Singer and his system?"

The answer is no. Now what?
Are you using the word impossible? Said the guy who claims to have seen 18 yo's in a row. WOW, HOW RICH IS THAT?

I don't see how it is impossible or even close it is if you start at .25c and keep bumping up levels. You could eventually hit a $2500 win goal once you are at the higher denomination. So no, it's not even close to being impossible. I would say its very likely. And since you claim to know very little about his system I have no clue why or how you would think hitting a $2500 win goal is hard to obtain. For all you know he plays .25c for 10 hands and if he loses all 10 hands he bumps up to the $25 denomination.
Why don't you ask Rob? It's his system and I don't play it. Frankly I shouldn't have responded except that I know Rob starts at $1 or $2.

Are you afraid to ask Rob directly? You can. He's here.

Why are you asking me when I don't play anything like how Rob plays? Oh, I know why! You still want me to say Rob's system can't work. Sorry I'm not going to pass judgment on a system I don't know enough about and don't even use.

And kewlj that answer applies to you too... vehemently.
My play strategy, again, begins at dollars and ends up at $100.

400 credits = 80 hands....if you lose every one of them. This is why it's easy to tell mickey is a school dropout: he can't read.

One thing you guys should EASILY get is that playing progressive denomination/game volatility video poker for a minimum $2500 win goal with a session bankroll of $57,200, is SLIGHTLY more difficult than figuring out how to wipe your ass with your opposite hand.
And mickey----I mean with using toilet paper.