Now really KJ. How many times do you intend to cuss at me on a forum? Because we both know in real life I would knock you on your ass. Seems all I really need to do is walk into El Cortez and look for Nancy-boy playing DD shoes? Yes, the one who is losing money and threatening to call his attorney might be a clue. So pull the panties out of your crack and try to have a civil discussion which is what you say you seek.
So getting back to your cheating claim. There are 32 cards with a tag value of 10 in a double deck. HiLO only accounts for 77% of the cards played. The 10s represent 31% of the total cards played and 40% in HiLO. It stands to reason you are going to see them come in groups at times througout a deck. Question is how much is too much? Mind you, I'm about the only one giving you a chance to explain your prophecy.
So these 10s come out in clusters of 4? 8? 16? or all 32 either at the top, middle, or bottom depending on who cuts. Now the Aces are strategically scattered with the low cards? or just so only the dealer can get a blackjack? Are you side counting the Aces? Are they 1 in every 13 cards?
How many 10s are played by the end of the deck? Do you know? Point is, you would know with a column count. But you are either guessing or side counting 10s, no? Plus since you are only tracking 77% of the cards played, you have no idea of the ratio between 10s vs cards played at the end or throughout the deck. Only the beginning which I just told you.
You are deck estimating so you wouldn't know exactly what is played and what still remains. So how do you intend to prove an imbalance of tens? The 4+ and 4- theory does not hold water. The rebuttal is simply, we don't allow card counters. So all you really have is this alleged magic chip. I know, I know you bought a shuffle machine, but obviously, don't know how to set it.
Now, I will admit I've seen some machine shuffle decks that make me go Hmmm. But that is far far better because it takes the hand shuffle away from the dealers. Thus mechanics can't hurt you.





Reply With Quote