Except for the one main FACT that the "ap's" want to duck: A Player Who Starts Betting "Much Bigger" When The Count Gets Positive Will Get Thrown Out And His/Her Picture And Details Will Instantly Be Shared With Every Casino In The State.
Wise up, BBB.
And I assume something that also "makes perfect sense" is that if he loses and leaves the table because of a negative count, he'll grab a seat at the second table he was simultaneously counting, unless, of course, his count was negative there too. That's where the story begins to cause kew to have something called a "dilemma".
A total BS story at it's finest....and one only a sensitive liberal from the weirdos at WoV could be talked into being real.