kew, you're throwing around the same load of crap that you did on your two-table nonsense, where "partial counts" mean something. Why do you persist with such a moronic position?

Now we get further treated to the "accumulated EV" baloney. It's no different than the wizard, Dancer, and a few others claiming "even if we lose, we win!" because every hand was played at a theoretical edge. The old phantom bucks claim again.

So let's hear the REAL story why this Munchkin weirdo is afraid to appear here. Obviously, he doesn't like to take a beating on the tough questions like you do. Or maybe he's unlike you and has a problem with lying.