Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Why all the dancing around Dan? I can't even believe you're trying to make so many changes after the bet was proposed.

People doubt my SPS wins and I'm trying to show everyone that it wins. It's just like it always has been--I bring a $57,200 bankroll and I stop playing the strategy when a minimum $2500 profit is attained or I run thru all 6 denominations and stop. And that does NOT mean I've lost. I could be ahead $1950 or $100 at that point....or I could be behind.

You keep claiming a fear that I'll do some hocus pocus or something to get me to a 99 per cent win rate or whatever...I can't even follow it. And even worse, you cling to the needed belief that the winning sessions will all get wiped out and more by the losing session. You're doing the same thing Arco always did--you're ignoring the avg. loss of a losing session (where some are winners, just not the minimum $2500) and you purposely neglect that there are at times very large winners.

So please stop with the deflecting and either accept my original bet and limits or not. I have no idea why you say the challenge is bs. I'll play ten sessions no different than I always have.
If you can't follow what I wrote, get someone else to explain it to you.

I laid it out very clearly.

You want people to bet against a Martingale system producing ANY profit (even a tiny one).

That would be a ridiculous bet to make, as a Martingale system is highly likely to produce a small win, but has a small chance of a huge loss. So a one-time flat bet on "Will I win or not?" is totally unfair to the side betting against a win.

I'm sure you realize this, which is why you're trying to bait people into this sucker bet.

You can pretend not to understand our explanations, but it doesn't change the fact that you're offering a sucker bet which doesn't prove anything about the profitability of your strategy.

In fact, even the bet I proposed wouldn't PROVE anything, because either side could get lucky or unlucky. But I don't care about that. I just want to make money.

Rob, I just agreed that you CAN switch denominations from $0.25 to $10 (a swing of a factor of 40, if you want it). Shouldn't that be enough? And you can play as many or as few hands as you want, provided we have some reasonable minimum.

A cross-book is most fair. If you win, we double it. If you lose, you pay us the amount you lost.

Just think -- if you hit a royal at $10, you will get $80k! $40k from the casino, and $40k from us!

Why aren't you jumping at this?