Originally Posted by coach belly View Post

If you didn't want to cause confusion, then why would you create a more complicated scenario,
rather than provide a simple answer to a straight-forward question?

Are you suggesting that Singer's strategy will produce session losses that are 6x greater than his session win goal?
I meant that the system is a more complicated version of the concept that I introduced.

The simplest answer to Alan’s question is this: No, cashing out after reaching a win goal is not sufficient to make a negative expectation game positive.

I don’t know what his strategy will produce. What I do know is his session bankroll is almost 23 times greater than his stated win goal per session. I also know that you can manipulate just about any game to have a very high probability of a session win if the session win goal is substantially less than the session bankroll or stop loss. The most common example is the Martingale, which this is not, but the concept is basically the same.