Your craps scenario is a retarded representation of what the VP bet entails,
just like your life is a retarded representation of normal adult behavior,
so go check your own head there Poindexter.
It's been explained that Singer would have an advantage if his only requirement
was that he must win at least $2500 in 8 of 10 sessions.
If the terms of the bet were modified, such that in addition to winning $2500
in 8 of 10 sessions, he must also win overall for the 10 sessions,
then that bet would favor the challenger?





Reply With Quote