If we can get the sore losers to stop with the dodge and deflect nonsense about how dire they wish our personal finances were, I'll ask the tough question again.

Seems everyone agrees I wouldn't have much chance of losing a session TODAY. Yet the ap's claim that I'll lose in some type of "long-term". Exactly how is that done....exactly why do my chances of winning any individual session go way down? It makes no sense. Remember, this isn't coin flips or blackjack.

# of hands played is not an indicator of some type of long term with my strategy. In about 350 individual sessions I estimate I've played 350 X 4 hours X 400 hph (don't get nervous--this is a complex strategy that requires slower, more attentive play) or about 560,000 hands. Yet even if I played 100,000 sessions there is no difference. Each session still has the same high probability of being successful.

In no case am I turning -ev into positive ev. That's just an uninformed argument point. But what I AM doing is proving the -EV games in a unique game like video poker, can indeed very consistently turn a profit. If I had started with a $6500 bankroll to make $2500 minimum then likely not. But with the $57,200 bankroll I use, it almost assures success every time out.

Now somebody please tell me how I've done the impossible. Tell me something coherent without the continual dumb flame "you can only win like that if you play +ev games!"

One more point: 560,000 hands with a profit of $984,000. That's $1.75/hand played. Where else you people gonna find something so profitable for so little work? Is that why you don't want it to be??