Originally Posted by
regnis
Alan-I look at it this way. If I win, I have more $$ in the pocket. If I lose and get a rebate, I have more $$ in the pocket than I would have had without the rebate. So that is like a win. It's as if I played one more hand at 20% of my loss and won it. I still lost, but I lost 20% less.
That's right. No dispute about that. But the point I was making and a point Rob made was that you still had to win your bets. Otherwise loss rebates only reduced your losses.
Now mickeycrimm who seems to always want the last word is saying about loss rebates:
"But it does influence the amount of money you win or lose per the same amount of total wager."
Well that's only partially correct. Loss rebates do impact your losses but they do not impact the payoffs on wins. Now perhaps you have more money to bet because of loss rebates but that's not what mickeycrimm wrote.