Rob, would you take a bet stipulating that you would win at least 8 of 10 sessions, play 10 sessions, and have a profit after 10 sessions?
Rob, would you take a bet stipulating that you would win at least 8 of 10 sessions, play 10 sessions, and have a profit after 10 sessions?
Take off that stupid mask you big baby.
Its already been explained. Rob has made lots of propositions in 15 years. He keeps doing the two-step until you quit trying to take the bet. No one has been able to pin him down on a money bet yet. Arci pinned him down on an honor bet and Rob welshed it. Who wants to deal with a slug like that? Why don't you take the bet?
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I'm completely lost on this response. Arci's simulations said Argentino/Singer would win more than 8 out of 10 sessions. I thought the proposed wager was that he win 8 out of 10 sessions. So if I agree with arci's simulations, I would be stepping up to the plate to bet ON winning 8 out of 10 sessions.
Or is Rob suggesting that the proposed wager is actually about overall winning or losing money for the 10 sessions combined? I didn't read it that way. I wish he'd make up his mind regarding what the wager is supposed to be.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
With this logic I suppose all those people who write books, make videos, run schools and or whatever else have never been a success in the world of Gaming as well.
No successful handicappers blabbing or tooting/touting either??
Do any successful people ever brag anywhere about anything?
I like Trump but does he do anything like blabbing or tooting?
Did Trump become the President of the United States of America?
Does Trump ever Tweet on Twitter?
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Deep into the article Teams gives a tip on sports betting. The author quotes teams as saying this:
"Here’s an easy tip from Teams: If an NFL underdog is ahead by a lot at the half, against a public outfit like the Patriots or Cowboys, make a halftime bet on the dog to cover the spread."
I know a fair amount about sports betting and I've never heard of that play before. Furthermore, it doesn't sound logical. Furthermore I've never heard of any kind of play such as this, being advantageous in every situation without doing any other handicapping.
My conclusion: Bullshit
the foolish sayings of a rich man often pass for words of wisdom by the fools around him
I heard a tip long ago about betting baseball (MLB) and supposedly every year it rings true.
It is along the same lines as your above "Teams" example.
I forget the percentage that you will come out ahead but supposedly...
if you bet on the dog on the money line when it is +200 or better on every game through the whole season.
You will have x amount of profit in percentage. I forget what the percentage is.
Those guys have tracked this for decades and say it comes out.
I can not confirm nor deny it but I head it from a guy who heard it from a guy.
the logic behind Teams's play is that the public is going to flood money on the fave in this situation causing the books to put up an out of balance line.
as if the betting public is stupid. maybe they sometimes are but not too often in the NFL.
you can find out of balance lines in very little college games where the books only put up lines so as not to displease some alums who might want to bet on their team. for other reasons also. the competition forces them to.
in college basketball the books don't know or even care (in the little games) if a team's high scorer is injured. they could care less. it's the only bet you can make inside a casino where the management knows little or nothing about the game being played. a bot or a human just makes a few calculations based on their previous stats to come up with a line. I'm writing about a game like Chattanooga at The Citadel.
the foolish sayings of a rich man often pass for words of wisdom by the fools around him
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I think rob just lives wherever he can find a free large overnight parking spot.
Walmart is starting to not allow overnight RV parking in some locations.
But I have to laugh at the constant bs about me stealing electricity and parking in driveways etc. Most of you ap's live like slugs in dumpy city apts., with mickey's holed up in some shithole Montana joint next to an all night bar. We travel between our 3 homes in Az. and S. Dakota in either a camper or a 45' class A that I put up a pic of but one idiot keeps claiming we don't have one for whatever strange reason. I know....our son grabbed it from us on our way back from SD so he must be right....
I have to say, it's fun picturing how most of you live and fear how you'll make it when you're at retirement age, while we don't live extravagantly, but it's not something most of you will ever see. Forum rats rarely do.
So those of you who work? Thank you, and keep paying my social security since you'll never see any of it. In fact, get a 2nd job if you will. And Mr. Trump? Thank you for the 7-digit profit on our retirement accounts in the Argentino household (that's for you, red) since you won the historic election!
Oh and the nutjob hatemonger atheists and agnostic weirdos from WoV who don't want to believe in God without "scientific proof"? No wonder you dumbos aren't believing Alan when he says he witnessed 18 consecutive yo's. Nothing means anything to you constipated jerkwads unless you see it for yourselves.
Most of you are so clueless.
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 09-04-2018 at 03:44 PM.
There are like a total of 3 people who claim they believe Alan seen 18 yo's in the row. I highly doubt they actully believe it. Religious or non-religious beliefs have nothing to do with it. What makes it even more unbelievable is all the other facts surrounding his crapstory, not to mention Alan's word is not reliable, to say the least.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)