Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
I believe Alan likely had winning years. I believe Rob had winning years.

But I don't believe either have a net profit overall.
I understand this but do you? What you're essentially saying is it's possible my play strategy can win by playing 40-50 sessions some years, but other years it does not....and the losing years lose more than the winning years win, right?

So tell me, is this the result of playing 99.6% games, whereas if you believed I won overall as I have done, then that could only be the result of playing 100.1% games?

Think about the mathematical chaos in all that.