Au contraire.
Keep on keeping on, KJ.
While I don't play BJ I enjoy the mental fisticuffs involved in gambling arguments.
Hell, once in awhile a kernel of wisdom can even be discerned.
Au contraire.
Keep on keeping on, KJ.
While I don't play BJ I enjoy the mental fisticuffs involved in gambling arguments.
Hell, once in awhile a kernel of wisdom can even be discerned.
What, Me Worry?
And please explain in precise detail where this anonymous guy "kew" has ever produced even one iota of evidence that has "proven" any type of "track record" whatsoever that he has won "a million dollars" playing by over an "extended period of time". Mickey, can ya do that....can ya do that mickey??
Alan, I believe you asked the tough question once again, and once again, you caught this collection of anonymous idiots with their pants down as they desperately try to save AP face. Danky ever got her tit in a wringer when she suggested a $30k win can come just as much as a $30k loss could....in one week without increasing bets! Then we were treated to the theory that kew was AHEAD when he lost $29k, so it doesn't really matter much at allThese people will reach for any straw that's out there.
And everyone of these fools knows full well that kew is simply making up his "bj pro life" fantasy here anyway, because they know it's impossible to bet $25, 25, 25, 25, then suddenly throw down a $500 bet when the player knows the count just turned good, the computer upstairs knows the count just turned good, and the eyes in the sky knows the count just turned good. That stuff was stopped years ago and everybody knows it. These clowns just want the "theory" of doing it to live on, and kew wants everybody to believe he does it.[/QUOTE]
Robocchio, please explain in precise detail that you have produced even one iota of evidence that you won a million dollars.[/QUOTE]
Once again mickey shows how ignorant, unintelligent, and fearful he is.
Guess what goose egg? The others didn't jump on this first because they were waiting for someone dumb and gullible enough to show they could not answer the tough question, and who would instead divert and deflect it into a different question about somebody else altogether.![]()
Kewlj wrote:
There are numerous reasons why a player or team would track EV. Most of the successful teams and even many solo player pay themselves according to EV results. For team platers EV accumulated represents you share of contribution to team win. For solo players it is a way to be sure you don't pay yourself more than you have actually "earned", taking variance instead of money won. But you, Alan, won't understand this.
You're absolutely right kewlj! I don't understand this and based on everything you wrote I can't understand it. I can't understand accumulating +EV and losing real money.
Now, I'm asking. Is that so terrible? I'm honestly asking.
A simple concept? Losing money is a good thing because you were "accumulating positive expected value" -- and you call that a simple concept? What planet are you guys from?
Go call up your bank and tell them you lost $29,000 but you accumulated +EV and then ask if that will help you improve your credit score.
You guys are crazy.
Did anyone say losing money is a good thing?
Take off that stupid mask you big baby.
Even when he doesn't say it blackhole, he does. This show he puts on....it's all about the craving of relevance. And it's painfully clear to him every time he huffs and puffs and says he's "done and not ever coming back!" Everyone knows he actually WILL be back--and rather quickly too. That's because he goes into panic mode after a few hours of feeling lonely without the attention, and he pretends to be relevant whenever he posts his nonsense about "pro bj" play. The few clowns who go out of their way to support the fool are more than likely throwing up at the same time.
Just look at the boatload of crap he just posted about accumulated EV and "paying oneself". I can only guess as to how much mickey is really laughing at him behind his back after that whopper!
Frankly Rob it's insane talk. Imagine for a minute that you run a video poker team.... your team just lost $5,000 playing a +EV progressive royal to a non team player, but the team wants to be paid based on their +EV play?
Ya know RS, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to know that rocks can't take off and land.
Sorry but the emperor is not wearing any clothes.
Last edited by mickeycrimm; 11-20-2018 at 04:04 PM.
Druff, let us know when you receive redietz’ credit score.
[QUOTE=mickeycrimm;78011]They will get payed but not the way your dumb ass thinks. Team members are paid an hourly plus a bonus for hitting a royal. So yes, they will get paid even if a non-team member gets the royal. What you don't get about teams is there is an owner of the team....and his employee's.
Druff, let us know when you receive redietz’ credit score.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)