What's more difficult to get, a royal flush or four aces with a kicker?
There are four royals: 20 cards
There are four aces, plus 12 kickers: 16 cards
With the royals there are four sets of absolute cards
There are only four aces
What's more difficult to get, a royal flush or four aces with a kicker?
There are four royals: 20 cards
There are four aces, plus 12 kickers: 16 cards
With the royals there are four sets of absolute cards
There are only four aces
Last edited by Alan Mendelson; 11-30-2018 at 05:02 AM.
Last edited by AxelWolf; 11-30-2018 at 06:04 AM.
Alan, how can you not know this after playing VP for decades?
Actually there aren't 12 possible Aces w a kicker.
There is only one hand with four aces. There are 12 kickers.
The way to look at the problem is this:
When dealt four to the royal you have a 1/47 chance.
When dealt four aces you have 12/47 chances.
When dealt 3 Aces with a kicker you have 1/47 chance which is the problem in Triple Double Bonus.
Royal Aces Bonus is my favorite game. Can't find it anywhere but for the two machines at Rincon.
A pet peeve of mine is the SF. There's 36 of them, and some years I get more royals than SF's. And in the years I see more SF's it's no where near 9:1 in favor of the SF. Plus, they should pay more than 250 in every game.
Let the insults begin!
Axel, can you say without reservation that you actually get nine times the number of SF's as you do royals? Not in theory, but actually. I never have. Not even close.
Well, you leave me no choice but to insult your intelligence. This is a big tell on your knowledge of video poker. In the Jacks or Better games the odds of a SF are around 9,000. The odds of a royal are around 40,000. You make a SF about 4.5 times as often as a royal, not 9 times as you have written above. Thanks for showing how ignorant and uninformed you are on the subject.
You hew hawed your way into this one.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Still LMFAO!! Supposed to make SF's nine times more than royals? HAHAHAHA!!! That's some funny shit, Robbie. World's greatest video poker player? HAHAHAHA!!! World's biggest gambling quack is more like it. Quack! Quack! Quack! Damn, that's funny. And you wonder why everybody laughs at you? HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
What's even more odd is that supposedly Rob doesn't go for 3-card SF draws. Idk what % of SFs come from 3-card draws, but it's gotta be pretty high up there.
#FreeTyde
You just spelled it out...
4 aces with...
2c
2d
2h
2s
3c
3d
3h
3s
4c
4d
4h
4s
Each of those is an individual hand making 12 possible 4oak...
Now, playing double double aces and faces you will see more 4awk since you will hold more ACE and pictures... where is regular DDB you hold A and a suited face card and kill your chances of 4awk
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)