Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Other members, like coach belly, slingshot, You, moses, monet have challenged me, my claims and even trolled at times, and I am quite certain don't care for me very much, but I would not lobby for their banning because they do contribute positively at times.
Can you believe, little old me, happens to know the self professed greatest sports handicapper on earth? HE had the easiest pick of the entire college bowl season. Too bad, he only had $80 left to bet on the game because he'd lost the rest of his bankroll on the earlier games. But to hell with money management, he is in it for the long run and he should live to be at least 300, meth aside. Who wouldn't love to be the house with this guy? Yes, according to him, I will continue to lose without his picks or adopting his skills.
Well, I went 5-1 for the NFL season at $2,200 a game. You do the math.

I could care less what KJ does or claims he does or claims is possible. I see value in being the house in pitch games with 60% pen, straight up, and HiLo with a limited spread and todays rules. So yes, I will take that bet. Reverse game selection. RGS. There is a new term for the wisdomites at BJTF.

I don't care what anybody thinks or believes what I do. Game selection is my key. So I will play straight up single deck, 3.2, 6 rounds with 2 hands on the last round, against a cheating machine or a dealer or a human. I do it damn near everyday. So why would I turn down the opportunity to complete against someone who has the cash and won't 86 me?

What I don't understand is this constant desire of those who to speak to or write about it all. IF it works? Be happy it works. If it doesn't work. Find what does work or stop doing it.

Two things I won't play is a dealer that preferential shuffles or shuffles every time I make an increased bet beyond round 4. Just Walk Away Renee. The one thing I watch is the dealer who can seem to pull out a 10 whenever necessary. That's not always a bad thing.