Originally Posted by
regnis
Alan--Arci wants to have it both ways. When I calculated the number of hands playing 40 hours per week, and generously gave him a 1% return, and that only came out to $50,000, he said he doesn't play that much. So how does he achieve this great windfall that he claims to have made by only playing for short periods of time on a game that has no big winners other than the Royal.
And how can he espouse the merits of long term play by the math when he says he doesn't play for long periods?
Sheesh---Rob should be licking his chops on this one.