Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
Originally Posted by Bob21 View Post
Interesting story. Since this article was written to the already convertered (meaning people who think casinos and police are corrupt and always in the wrong), I spent some time researching this case last night. There is more to it than what you’re reading here. Casinos are not that dumb. They did not try to prosecute some gamblers just because they won on one of their games. This article says the prosecution case fall apart. This basically means they didn’t have enough evidence to move forward. That doesn’t mean they didn’t have a case.

There’s some questions left unananswerd. For example, how did some gamblers (or APs if you like) who live in Vegas find out about a very vulnerable slot game in Illinois? I get that the prosecution wasn’t able to link them to anybody at the casino or the slot manufacture, but this doesn’t mean their wasn’t a link. This could have been an inside job. Sounds to me like they did a good job covering their tracks.

Note that the casino sued the slot manufacture too. Again, there is a lot more to this case than you’re reading here. How did a game this vulnerable make it to the floor? Sounds like something fishy is going on.

Obviously, since the casino didn’t have enough evidence to move forward with the case, the gamblers are going to counter sue for being falsely arrested. Anybody would do this. As Mickey said, the gamblers will probably get a big settlement. This happens all the time. It’s easier for big business to pay these people off to make them go away then to fight it.

As Ron Singer has already said, I wouldn’t be so gullible when you read these type of articles. Common sense should tell you there is more to this case than what the press is telling you...

If you are following any advice Singer gives, you are already a lost cause.

Wise Up!
As my dad used to say, “I didn’t fall off a turnip truck yesterday.” What does this mean? I have a brain and don’t believe everything I read. There is usually more to a story this complicated than what you’ll read in a six paragraph article. I repeat. This article was written to the gullible and already converted.

You’re the one who needs to “wise up.”