Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Quit telling me to reread your bullshit. Don't play that fucking game with me. You believe the players are guilty and the house is innocent without any evidence either way.
Apparently Bob21 expects people to withhold judgement against the casinos with no evidence while he gets to believe the players are guilty with no evidence.
We’re all entitled to our opinion. You believe the reverse based on no evidence. I based my belief on the prosecutors spending a year gathering evidence to bring a case against them...and they acted in a guilty mannner. They acted the way a bank robber would act if they robbed a bank. A prosecutor wouldn’t have brought charges against them if they didn’t have something on them. Yes, the judge threw it out, but we don’t know why. If he’s like most judges, he probably threw it out because the prosecutors got their evidence in a wrong way.

Yes, the gamblers countersued when the case was thrown out. This doesn’t prove anything other than they saw an opportunity to take advantage of the situation. I think most people would do this, regardless if they were guilty or innocent.