Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
That's wishful thinking axel, and totally devoid of any logic. You're speaking from the position of pretending to know anything about the play strategy I use that's made me a consistent winner, and at the same time implying all AP's win.

Just look at the nonsense you wrote, and I understand why you chose to exclude any details of your silly claims:

First, I never included my play strategy in either of my books, so your initial assertion has no basis in truth. Big surprise....but who expected a well thought-thru, truthful initial response from you anyway.

Next, when I win I go home until I choose to play again. I never "give it all back that day or whatever" because I stop playing--something AP's are unable to do by the way.

Then--and this is your funniest lie--anyone who plays like I do will in fact win consistently, because I have. It is you people with your irresponsible "99.9% means you will lose consistently, and 100.1% means you will win consistently" uneducated rambling that proves you know nothing about how video poker actually works.

Have you noticed a pattern? Even you uneducated "AP's" with no 401k's should get it. You have no idea if Alan wins or loses at VP so you choose to say he loses. Why? Because he also chooses not to wear the secret AP decoder ring. He also chooses to agree with SOME of what I do. And the best part is, both of us use mostly ap-tactics in our play because they are the simplest form of approaching the game. As do most players. It's only those ap's who choose to go on forums and pretend they have the patent on "intelligent vp play" who have talked themselves into believing that they're the few....the different....the oh-so-very-special among all players.

Yet NONE of you play any different pay tables than the rest of us, because there aren't any different pay tables out there. All you people do is create +EV and winners out Of slot club and other side fluff that the rest of us look at as player loyalty extras, having zero to do with our machine/gaming results. AND WHEN FORUM AP'S ARE ALLOWED TO SELF-VALUE THEIR SLOT CLUB ETC. REWARDS, YOU WILL NEVER RUN ACROSS ONE WHO SAYS THEY LOSE.

Wise up.
As usual, this "Rob Singer person" changed what Axelwolf said to suit himself. Axel never said -EV players consistently lose and +EV players consistently win. That is your word and you inserting it is a big lie. That's all you have lies and make up stuff.

Now if you substitute this word you put in that axel never said "consistently" with the phrase "in the long-term" or "long run", then you have Axelwolf's meaning. AP's think long-term because that is when the mathematics kicks in. No AP would ever say something like "consistently".

Non-AP's (losing or -EV players) focus on short-term results, where anything can and will occur. THAT is variance. Your Mistake, Singer/Argentino, and I don't think it is a mistake at all but rather the intentional scam that you consistently (<- ) push is that you can take a bunch of "short-terms" and equate them to "long-term" when it doesn't work that way. Again the easy example is a player can easily win 2 or 3 spins on roulette playing black, but try doing that every day for a year. A bunch of small, short-term results does not equal long-term. THAT is NOT the way the math works, except for in your alternative universe.

And as per you last point, I did just that last year. I re-evaluated my machine play, which was totally dependent on not the slot club points, but very much related mailer offers to bump the whole exercise into +EV territory, and decided that with tightening conditions, it was no longer worth it to me and have all but stopped that part of my supplemental AP play. My machine play now is very small, just a small amount of play to generate some food offers. It's not a money maker. Might even be slightly losing proposition than if I just went a head and paid cash for my meals. I will continue to re-evaluate and decide that.