Originally Posted by
Frank Kneeland
Yes I believe all that is true. And I also may believe a quick in and out strategy might be better for someone that did not want to make gambling the focus of their trip to LV. It is this quote that you have on your press release page that concerns me,
""Video poker can be beaten, but not by buying those tempting, math-only based strategies that are easy to sell, difficult to learn" and, as the author of The Undeniable Truth About Video Poker says, "impossible to succeed with".
I would have no problem with the use of the phrase, "Difficult to succeed with". By using the word "impossible" you are opening up yourself to a lot of ridicule from people who are succeeding at AP and have been for umpteen years. I will make no personal statement here about my own success, as I consider talking about results tacky and not proof of anything, since in a game involving a random element it is possible to win playing badly and lose playing well.
Anyway, you really should change "impossible" to some other word that implies difficulty. The gap in meaning between difficult and impossible is like the difference between 1 and infinite.