Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Originally Posted by Keystone View Post
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

More of your alternate kew-reality lies. Obviously, that WAS a major penalty because it was officially called as such. You may disagree with it just as you do much of everything said about you on forums that gets you a major banning penalty, but thank goodness we have real world order in the NHL.
WTF do you know about hockey Singer?....I played hockey for 15 years and I can tell you it was a reaction call....it never gets a Major penalty without Pavelski flopping around like a seal....so lets stick with what we know here...what you know is sitting on your couch in a stained wife-beater, picking your ass and then smelling your fingers
I'm not seeing that you get it, other than you got irritated yet again by the truth.

The official--not you--made the call. That means it happened. This is nothing like the missed call in the Saints game. It is what it is. Deal with it. Pavelski had a bloodied face. That has MAJOR written all over it. If you want to whine about the pathetic VGN's blowing yet another big playoff series, get some sour cream and cheese to go with those crackers.
Pavelski had a bloddy face because he fell down and hit his head, not because he was hit in the head. lol.

AND it is EXACTLY like the saints call, except opposite. In the Saints call, the referee didn't want to make a call that would decide the game, so he allowed an obvious penalty to go uncalled. If that is the criteria, then there are no rules enforced in key moments. No that wouldn't be right. And if that was the criteria, there would have been no penalty called in this case, so as not to have the ref decide the outcome. But that is NOT the criteria. A foul or penalty is a foul or penalty. And should be called. But it shouldn't be enhanced because it is a key time in the game either. And to that extent this should have been a 2 minute cross check penalty. 1 goal would have been scored, the lead cut to 3-1, still momentum would have switched a bit because it was a stupid penalty by the Knights, and see what happens.

But to give a team the opportunity to score 4 goals and completely change the game. That is like having a penalty that is a 12 point shot in basketball, or giving a football team 4 consecutive possessions.

And btw, Singer, I am still waiting on your acceptance of the wager in the Axel meetup thread.