Advantage play / cheating / crime....where is the line?

[kewlJ]

The very funny part of all this is that if a known forum AP who has never criticized him for anything had said they had worked hard for, discovered, and played a play like this, kew wouldn't have enough praises in his basket to lay upon the guy. He'd be doing the jig non-stop for hours over it.

While I know you would like to make this about me and you and in truth I don't like you as you said horrible untrue things about my partner/spouse after he had passed away, but this isn't about me or you.

This is just not my definition of advantage play. I am a guy who stopped hole-carding which I was successfully doing for a few months because I just don't like winning that way. And that's not illegal, although a grey area in my mind as to cheating. I am a guy who got up from a blackjack table and walked when I realized the new, raw dealer was paying everyone on every hand as if he broke. (If he drew a 20 and you had an 18 he paid as a win).

I just have lines of what is right and wrong and how I want to win. I guess you don't. Maybe most AP's don't, I don't know.

I go back to the same question Rob: If you really feel there is nothing wrong with this, why did you specifically wait 10 years until you are sure the statute of limitations has run out? Please, come on, you can come up with some kind of bullshit answer can't you? Not that it will matter.....the action says it all.

For God sakes, if the statute of limitations is a consideration, it is not a legitimate AP play. That is my new rule.