Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Tableplay, some of you guys are just not being honest about this situation. If you were to get an account hacked and your identity stolen, have charged run up on your credit card and new accounts opened in your name, would you show up at the trial of the guy who hacked you and tell the judge he did nothing wrong, that all he did was push a few buttons on his computer and there is nothing illegal about that?
No, I would want the guy incarcerated. However the Nestor/Kane move is not using stolen passwords and usernames. I suppose in my case this is all moot as I have no intention of attempting this move (as you correctly state this decision is not driven by morals).
How about this? A guy picks a lock and breaks into a house. His defense is that it is not his fault. It is the fault of the lock company for not having a more secure lock. Do you think that is going to fly? No I think the guy will do some time Do you think he did nothing wrong?I think the guy did something wrong. However no one is picking the lock of the Game King 5.0 and stealing the cash/vouchers

I do you one better. You guys that are arguing with me that there is nothing wrong with what Kane and Nestor did, and have a mother who is alive and cognitive, go to your mom and explain to her what you want to do, that you would like to go to the casino, win a jackpot that pays $500, manipulate the machine to paying you $20,000 and ask her if there is anything wrong with that? Now after you put some ice on your face because your mom slapped you upside the head asking "what the hell is wrong with you?", you come back and tell us what she said. Were my mom above ground she would tell me not to do it. I have no plans to do it for non-moral reasons


Wrong is wrong! And getting paid $20,000 when you hit a $500 jackpot is wrong. You people should stop pretending to be stupid, and be honest.