Originally Posted by smurgerburger View Post
Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
Originally Posted by Bob21 View Post

I agree, but they were still sleazyballs. I guess you could call them legal sleazyballs. Lol
I tend to think they were sleazeballs, but not for what they did, but for how they went about it all, and how acted towards each other, and how they got greedy. They could have had it made. I do think turning a hit they found on a machine they didn't play to get and turning it into a jackpot could be illegal. There is no way I would do that.
I think the bit about Kane demanding 50% of Nestor's wins, if true and not taken out of context, is astonishingly greedy and stupid. They should have divided the country in half and gone their separate ways.
Why do you say that? Nestor was a loser. When he was living in Pennsylvania, he was on welfare (public assistance). At least that’s what the article said. What grown 40 year old able body man sits on welfare and can’t find a job? When he was in Vegas, he lost $20,000/yr for several years until he moved back to Pennsylvania to sit on welfare. At least, that’s the picture the article paints of Nestor.

This is probably why Kane called him up, and offered him this opportunity. He knew Nestor wasn’t doing anything. Kane gave him a proposal: He would revel a play if he got half of Nestor’s winnings. What did Nestor have to lose? This was better than what he was doing, sitting on welfare.

Obviously, Kane should have never brought Nestor in on this play. He didn’t know it’d backfire on him. And no, I do not believe Nestor contributed anything to finding this play, even though I know that’s Nestor’s story. Nestor is too stupid to bring anything to the table.

It sounds like once Nestor learned about this play, he decided to go back on his word. So Nestor is the biggest sleazyball. It’s hard to know what to believe with his story. I’m sure Kane’s version is much different than Nestor’s.