I had a surveillance guy that I only knew from a forum that I communicated with privately for a while. (it has been a few years now). This was not a personal friend like my pit friend, so grain of salt type thing. But I found him credible in some things he shared with me and incorporated that into how I play with the goal of longevity. This is the source of that, "top priority or near the top is Employee theft".

So another thing he told me that I think pertains to this situation: We were talking about card counting of course, because that is what I do. I asked where on the priority list card counters were? His answer...it depends. On a Tuesday morning at 10 am, maybe top or near the top. On a Saturday Evening at 10 pm, probably not even on the list, unless it was someone playing Purple/Orange or above. My point: Robs statement that they are never doing this or that.....That's not credible.

I would think....and this is only me, that for a hand pay jackpot, unless it is that busy Friday/Saturday night where their are bigger fish to fry, Surveillance is going to take a look of at least a few second leading up to this jackpot. And they have plenty of time to do so as most handpays take 10-15 minutes. So why wouldn't they? It doesn't make sense to me that they wouldn't?

Rob is pretty adamant about the fact that they wouldn't because this is one of many pieces that he needs to fall in place for his story to be credible....that he did this for 6 years. One of many pieces he needs.

I am still skeptical of Rob's story and Claim. That has nothing to do with Mickey or Axel. They finding Rob credible based on knowledge or info that he has is not in question. That is a very narrow scope. The question for me is when did Rob obtain or have that information. His claim is he figured it out in 2003 and played the play for 6 years to the tune of 3 million dollars. There are other ways that he could have obtained this information after the fact, including finding a machine that this play was still possible After the fact (probably at some remote or indian casino) and executing the play successfully, winning some money. It is just fact that him having this info now does not mean he had it in 2003 or that he played this play for 6 years making 3 million dollars. And that is not about whether I like or dislike Rob.

The fact is that everything that Rob claims and says has been proven to be lies. All his claims, even stupid small stuff that has no significance to anything. So while I am not a person who requires anyone to provide proof of anything, and the people that usually do demand proof have strangely gone missing on this one, for me to believe, I would need to see some proof. I am not asking for it, nor interested in making any wager, but that's what it would take for me, based on Rob's long history of everything being BS. AND he is STILL doubling down on his other mathematically impossible claims.

I mean think about where we really are. Everything Rob claims have been completely impossible, mathematically impossible. So on this one the math could work. It's not mathematically impossible. That is the only very low hurdle that we have gotten by.