Kew, now it's your credibility that's coming into question... again.
Put your thinking cap on while I explain this.
1. You're playing ddbp for dollars. You hit the Deal button. Out comes 3 Aces.
2. You hit the Draw button. There's the 4th Ace with a 2. It's a 2000 credit win. The DU? appears.
3. You insert a bill, wiping off the question. You choose More Games.
4. You select $25, the select ddbp.
5. You hit Cash Out. Lights, sounds, and the screen goes off.
So upstairs, according to my critics who don't want anything to be actual, the "eyes" notice nothing funny, odd, or uncommon about how the player went about hitting that jackpot.
In Kane's and Nestor's case--and especially at the very paranoid Wynn--they either never bother looking, or they just looked the other way?
No, the eyes do not look at handpay jackpots unless they have a pro-active reason to. That should be obvious to someone like you. In Kane and Nestor's case, they certainly had a reason to if that were the case, and still no one looked.
I've had many machines opened and menus surfed etc. after a number of my jackpots. That's simply checking the card sequence and if all was working properly with no outside influence. Due diligence. Then there's your "in the database" claim. When I visited a casino once a month? Really? They didn't even get Kane or Nestor into this secret "database" of suspicious players. Fremont even took out the LOW LEVEL machine they hammered for $75,000 instead of placing them on some list.
Calling what I'm saying happened as not credible because of known facts is one thing. But making these helter-skelter assertions about me that didn't apply to the two guys who got caught, is just empty hoping.
Reply With Quote