Ignoring the fact that double-up must be turned on for a second, how many people do you think hit a high-paying hand and then immediately put more money in? When I say immediately, I mean before playing another hand, before switching games, before switching denominations...etc. After putting more money in (despite the fact that you just hit a big hand) you then have to switch denominations and go to the same game type which also (from anything I have read) must have the same paytable. At that point, you must hit, "Cash out," despite the fact that you not only just hit a big hand, but also that you added money immediately after doing so without playing any further hands.
I mean, to discover that it is repeatable, you would have to know it exists in the first place. To know it exists in the first place, you would have to, quite by accident, organically do something close to all of the steps listed above. Anyone who has played video poker would know that this is a highly unusual sequence of events.
My guess is Kane (being a hooked player) hit a good hand and added money with the intent to bump up denominations. Even after the good hand, he felt that he didn't have sufficient money on there to play the next denomination, so he added more. At that point, maybe he superstitiously decided to switch machines instead because he saw the good hand on the higher denomination, or maybe after switching, he just decided the machine would go awhile without a good hand happening since he just got one. Maybe he decided to leave. Who knows?
Those are pretty much the undisputed facts on this one, so I don't know why those would be called into challenge. It sounds like they interviewed the guy who discovered what Kane was doing.
My opinion is above. I wouldn't be surprised if more than zero other people also found it and are just not saying anything publicly. It is a really odd sequence of events, though, just to find it once.





Reply With Quote