I was contacted last night by a media source that I don't know anyone at, and they're asking to interview me about this. They also asked that I don't say any more about the play, although I believe I've said everything I remember already.
If I decide to do this, it'll be because I won't be "judged" by haters with an agenda, or by people who can't separate protective actions taken by me up until I got to this point, from the actual facts about how and why I waited 10 years to release this.
I'm in the process right now of checking with multiple casinos to see if they can get me play and W2G issuance records from 2004-2009. I have no idea if this is still possible, but I don't think there's any other method of supporting such a secretive play. These records will show comparatively small losses when playing with a card (exception: Venetian) and a record of a bunch of W2G's--with quite a few large ones. I'm willing to agree that even something like this, if available, won't silence critics, but that's not my goal anyway. What I want to do is show how it was me who found this play first, by research and trial & error, and not by being in some drunken stupor stumbling across it by accident as Wired suggests Kane did years later.
What'll be the end result? Since the statutes are spent, I expect to get banned from casinos maybe? But that's really irrelevant since the winnings have already been secured and my casino days are just about closed out anyway.
At any rate, ultimate satisfaction steps into play here. I've been battling with AP's for 20 years over their play and my play methods--much of it as a mandatory cover for what I was really doing. OF COURSE I know what AP's say they do has validity behind it. My original effort failed, so I came back in 2000 with a rage and a grudge....and a very successful Singer Play Strategy--but for only 4 years. What I did next made all my gambling ups and downs and arguing and future battles--real or not--completely worth it. Ten times over.
You don't want to believe it because it hurts too much to see the villainous "Rob Singer" close out his video poker career like this? As I said, so be it. But those without built-in biases against me....those who are actually looking at what I've presented in its purest form ever (who's the guy that kept telling everyone the Wired article had the incorrect sequence of steps?) will able to deduce this big and important story for what it really is.
History will be the judge.
Reply With Quote