Just to be clear Rob (not Ron this time. See I got it right), I’m also interested in your story too. My point was the discussion between Mission and me had to do with the wired article and Kane and Nestor. I find it interesting, and I’m trying to put it together by reading through the lines. I get what you’re saying about Kane having his own personal machine not playing much of a role, but I think it at least gave him some insight into how it worked. At the very least, this would have given him a leg up on someone who didn’t have one.Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
We all can see that Bob. But there's always ignorant people with an agenda. These particular two are serial haters, and no one--not even other AP's--can be allowed not to hate.Originally Posted by Bob21RS, I’m not interested in the Rob Singer part of it. I am truelly fascinated by the actual case itself with Kane and Nestor. It’s an interesting case on its own merits. How did these two bozos figure this out? I’m just trying to put their story together, and appreciate Mission engaging with me on this. I have no stake in the game. I’m just trying to understand it.Originally Posted by RS__
The technicians would have also given Kane some inside information on how the machine worked. They could have pointed out something that would have given Kane an indication a play like his would work without realizing it. I’ve had people give me information that has helped me solve a problem, and they weren’t able to solve it with the same information.
As far as the stature of limitations, I’ve done some research on this and it looks like the stature of limitations is 3 to 5 years for a felony or any kind of theft. Why did you wait 10 years to revel this play? It looks like you’d have been in the clear after only five years.
Reply With Quote