Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Go to your local university. Call up a math professor. Pay him a consultant's fee, like dinner at Outback. Ask him the odds against a 5% probability event going 0 for 150.

Or ask tableplay. But buy him TWO dinners at Outback.
Actually the number Singer first posted was that he had played 150-200 sessions without losing the 57K. I know exactly where that quote is, if there is any question. I guess we have just dropped to the lower end. But still the point is it will be outrageously long odds against.
Just one problem with this. Singer never said he won every session so it wouldn't be 0 for 150.
You just did what you are accusing me of doing. I didn't say he won every session did I? I said he said he played 150-200 sessions without experiencing that 57k loss that will occur every so often wiping out all those smaller winning sessions. Are you seriously endorsing progressive betting systems as a way to win against -EV games.