Originally Posted by
MaxPen
I'm not understanding this 150 sessions of VP for +375k. Obviously all sessions are not winning. Session win goal is 2500. There would have to be a hell of alot of sessions played to net 375k out, I'd imagine. Since the starting bankroll was 57k or whatever and never got depleted then I guess the claim is there never was never a losing session? What am I missing? Not that it matters.
For those 4 years I played probably a little more that 150 of my SPS sessions having nothing to do with the DU glitch, but not many more. So we use 150.
My session br was $57,200, but my overall gambling bankroll for my quest was 3X that figure. Naturally I had some losing sessions, but because of the strategy's structure where you go up and down in denominations and have multiple 40+ credit cash outs in different denoms along the way--and the fact that if I played thru the $100 level without hitting my $2500 min. win goal I'd quit and go home losing whatever amount--I never had a session where I lost $57,200 ($33k was the largest as I said).
What most people miss is that SOME sessions end with a very large net win, far more than the $2500 goal, because of some lucky Aces or royal hit or whatever at a hi limit. Most sessions do end up winning between $2500 and $3500, but it's the larger ones that mitigate all of the losing ones.
I know this flies in the face of standard math, which says no "system or distribution of wins can overcome negative expectation games" etc. But we're talking about a very small % here, vs. using a comparatively large bankroll to reach a 5% win....each and every session. And in sessions that have at least an 80% or better chance of winning, attaining +$375k in 150+ sessions is not far fetched.