Axel I don't want to quibble about wording. AS far as the double up bug you and mickey both said something to the effect that you found Singers claim credible because he had information that only someone who played would have. I am sort of lumping the two of you (you and Mickey together), I apologize for that. I think Mickey went a little further and concluded that He believed Singer's claim and that he made the money he said (with the double-up). If Mickey disputes that or thinks that I am mis-characterizing his comments, I will look for the quote that led me to that conclusion.

I don't think you went quite as far as mickey. I don't think that you said one way or the other whether you believe he played the double up and made the money he claimed. You just said something to the effect that he had knowledge that only someone who made the play would have. And yes, Axel you specifically stated that you still didn't believe Singers claims about his progressive wagering claims, which is why it seemed so odd when you chimed in tonight, "barking at me". Perhaps you didn't realize what the discussion was about and assumed I was still challenging the double up play. I am not. I am done with that. I have my opinion and others have a different opinion. I am now specifically challenging the progressive wagering stuff and the reason is because Singer has specifically doubled down on those claims in the past few days.