Advantage play / cheating / crime....where is the line?

[kewlJ]

As far as I'm concerned when you twist my words around to mean something else it is an attack on me. When I said I thought I could make money with Rob's system by generating freeplay you twisted that into I was saying Rob was using freeplay to make a profit. Don't twist my words up and you won't get called a pathological liar.

I did not realize you were saying that YOU could have made money via free play. Even now, having just gone back and re-read, I still don't see where you were referring to yourself. I thought you were referring to Singer.

And I know full well that we are talking about his progressive betting system and not the double up play. You say "it's impossible." I say "It's impossible given a large enough sample space." That little qualifier "large enough sample space" is important. If you think his system is totally impossible then make a bet with him for one session and see how you come out. You'll be a big dog on the bet because it's a very small sample space. The smaller the sample space the more likelihood of success, the larger the sample space the more unlikely the chance of success.

I don't consider 4 years and 375k a small sample size. That is a large enough sample size that you would expect the math to work and playing a negative EV game with no explanation of how he won, other than "the good side of the bell curve seems unrealistic to me.