Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
Mickey, you know everything I just stated is true. This explanation of yours that it was the free play that made the difference is just false. The story is changing just as Rob always does and you seem now to be grasping at straws trying to legitimize the preposterous claims of your new friend.
This one really takes the cake. In his obsession with discrediting Rob's story KJ has thrown all credibility out the door. He has once again twisted my words into something they didn't mean.
Redietz, would you like to tell me you don't see KJ's lies and misrepresentations in this thread? Are you sure that you want to continue to align yourself with a pathological liar?
First off, my dark side reference was a Star Wars reference. Going over to the dark side has nothing to do with knowledge or expertise or skill. It has to do with the uses to which the knowledge or skill or expertise is put.
Second, kewlJ got the gist correct with his misquote, but I have a thing about putting paraphrases in quotes. It's wrong and should not be done. So I'm okay with his paraphrase, but I am not okay with his putting words mickey did not exactly say in quotes. Repeat -- it is wrong.
Third, mickey, you know better than me perhaps, how many times "Singer" blew off the comp values and revenues in posts. What he said to you and Axel privately is one thing. What he posted for readers over decades is something else. So what should take precedent? His hundreds of posts over years on various forums or his hour-long private conversations in the last two weeks? The bad thing is, the more closely readers followed his public advice, the worse they would have done. So his most ardent supporters would have had the worst results. I see something wrong with that at its very core.
I don't think kewlJ is a pathological liar. You're implying that it's a bad thing to align yourself with a pathological liar, and yet "Singer" is self-reporting that he lied thousands of times in thousands of posts stretching decades. I wouldn't call that "pathological" if it was purposefully in service of protecting himself and screwing his readers. I'd call it "sadistic lying," because his readers/followers could have been spared by him simply not saying anything.