Part of the problem with all this is that when a person says they are ahead xxx amount after 4 years, you are expecting they are talking a very large sample size. Now Rob initially said 200 sessions, then dropped to 150-200 and later switched to the lower end of 150 sessions over that 4 years. So that is like 37 sessions a year. Not the kind of sample size you would expect from a professional player making a 4 year claim.
But you have to remember, these numbers (4 years) have also changed. Rob's initial claim was 10 years and a million dollars for the Singer progression system. Actually at first he said 900 and some thousand and then went as high as 1.5 million. THESE were the claims I began challenging. I can't help it if the claims are constantly changing.
The bottom line to all this is maybe Rob's claim of the double up bug is true. That is for everyone to decide for themselves whether they find that credible. I don't. I can't accept that without some sort of supporting proof from this person, who has made 100's of unsubstantiated claims. If he has proof and wants to present it, I reserve the right to change my mind. I even reserve the right to change mu opinion bases on new information which is why I hope he gets the platform he desires to keep explaining.
But this other claim that I call the Singer progression claim, he calls Singer SPS, is hog wash. It goes against mathematic principals. It did when he made the claim and it still does no now. And being that he is doubling down on that claim in recent days, I have the right to continue to challenge that claim. And being on the positive side of variance or the bell curve does not make it a legitimate system or claim. That is voodoo stuff.