Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Let's apply some data to your theory. Are you asserting 150 sessions, where the player plays between 1 minute and 15 hours/session, is long term or short term?

Next, what is the mathematical reason why the math geniuses, complete with Mensa diplomas et al, were unwilling to bet that I could both win at least 8 out of 10 sessions, as well as net at least a $25k profit? I say "mathematical reason" because atheists know no other way.

Finally, who here would be willing to bet me $10,000 that I could play and win at least $2500 in one session of my play strategy. How about the 2nd session? How about the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th etc.etc.etc.?

And, who wants to bet that any and all losing sessions will be easily mitigated and overcome by double the number of LARGER winning sessions?
I'll bet a dollar you can't do it. For as many sessions as you can handle. Heck, by the time I lose 50 bucks, you'll have won at least a quarter million, right?