For every record someone like you would bring up, the other side could bring up 3 that disprove them. The weirdo liberals (and if you want proof of that, just compare the mature, attractive, intelligent, intellectual guests and hosts on Fox News to the collection of googly-eyed lunatic men, gross and ugly women, queers, blather-mouthed minorities, and unsure-of-themselves hosts on CNN and MSNBC who pretend to be "alarmed" over this make-believe "man-made crisis").
Libtards screw up just about everything they touch. And you people wonder why Trump wins so much, and why he has so many staunch supporters that drive dems crazy? Just look at the Special Counsel fiasco we went thru for several years, culminating in that pathetic display yesterday. The democrats even made a sham out of that--they couldn't even do THAT right. Mueller said he had no idea about the political beliefs of his team--that's not "how I chose them". I agree. But it wasn't him that chose them, it was his top dog Weiss-whatever--a Hillary lover and donor and Trump hater--who assembled only all clones of himself in an attempt to follow thru on that "insurance policy" Stzrok and Page said they wanted. BUT EVEN THEY WEREN'T CAPABLE OF BRINGING THIS GREAT PRESIDENT DOWN!
Hopefully Barr looks into this "team" too as he continues to get to the corrupt bottom of the Democrat-fueled Russian interference frenzy. They will all eventually pay. And it was entirely all orchestrated by dirty Obama.
Even if climate change is caused by man in the near term, it will eventually get dwarfed out of existence when Atlas shrugs. Which is to say, when the earth gets to the meatier part of the Ice Age cycle, the earth will cool no matter what man has done (or not done).
https://www.latimes.com/environment/...ns-assumptions
These ice-ages you talk about were localized and not global. (Is that what you're talking about?) Not only that, the warming trend has been shown to be global and unlike any "cycle" we've ever seen. You guys need to get over your political biases. If you don't want to give a fuck, just don't give a fuck, but don't lie to yourselves with ridiculous denial.
I came across the link on FB. Made me think of you guys.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
This is fun! In yet ANOTHER example of the wimpy liberals being completely infuriated, the Supreme Court scored a direct hit for Trump tonight by allowing funding for the wall from the Pentagon.
The queer-infested ACLU invested heavily in trying to thwart a completely reasonable presidential policy for this. I can't express how much satisfaction I'm experiencing over how many snowflakes will go home to their parent's basements tonight, smoke weed, and hope they can discover some type of weirdo-laced reasoning for why nature just isn't on their sissified side.
Does it get any better than this??![]()
Non-sense. Go to places where it is actually starting to impact people. There is no advocacy here, there is just accepted scientific consensus.
You guys just believe what you want to believe, it is clearly obvious. I on the other hand would be happy to be shown something different. I've had this discussion countless times with wingnuts. Always bullshit yet they'll swear up and down it is some leftist conspiracy. Yea, across multiple decades, multiple countries, multiple disciplines. They're all fake scientists. Just like fake news. YEA THATS THE TICKET. <headslap>
I know the oil companies did a number on people for the past few decades, but the record is beyond clear.
BTW Mickey, those farmers are now getting paid more than before the tarriffs. Socialism at its finest.
Read some other news that just doesn't pander to what you want to hear, but it is obvious you don't want to be challenged. You want everyone and yourself to believe you're some kinda a moderate. That means you'd be open to logical thought etc. Clearly not the case.
Still a fan though !
I am referring to Eccentricity (http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/imag...d-the-ice-ages) which is defined as the change in the degree of ellipticalness of the earths orbit around the sun. It greatly affects glaciation, is global and has a period of 100,000 years or so. I never denied anything about the climate one way or the other with regard to man's influence on it, but you like to use strawmen. I just wrote that in the longer term, these cycles will overcome man's influence if there has been one. Long term cycles will also affect climate to the warm side of the spectrum as well and would be similar to what happened during the Eocene era (very warm period in earth's climate history). Man may or may not be around when these heavier factors get involved in impacting the climate.
So something on a 100,000 year period is the important stuff, yet you tell me I like to use strawmen? okey dokey.
You are right though, you didn't deny man-made global warming. You found some other psychological trick to tell yourself you're on the right side of the debate.
I am not going to go study this, but common sense tells me you are wrong. Global warming will continue until we've basically burned up all the oil/gas we can pull out of the Earth. Then there are other sources of the greenhouse gasses. Not sure why you think that something that apparently has happened many times over the course of Earth based life will not be dwarved by what we're doing currently.
The projection in your post is blatant. You are the one calling la la land bullshit logical. BTW, the only thing missing from the Dem debate last night was the Cuban National Anthem. And a recent study determined the green new deal will cost each American 60K per year in perpetuity.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Should there be some congressional action on guns after this weekend's shootings in El Paso and Dayton? But first we need to make that moron Beto O'Dork disappear from public life.
I'm obviously a gun owner and I now have ten of them--all handguns. I'd never buy an assault rifle because nobody outside of law enforcement and the military needs one. I'd have no problem if they were outlawed and had to be turned in for buyback. I'd like to see a mandatory 10 year sentence for any normal citizen caught with one after the warning period is over.
And why is it OK for mental cases or online racial or any other type hate mongers to have the right to buy guns? What is wrong with better, more comprehensive universal background checks on guns sold anywhere? Yes I know the inner city punks and thugs will continue getting their weapons illegally. But keep in mind, most of those are used to kill each other. No crying over spilled milk there.
So your joining the ranks of the other useless eaters that are willing to undermine the very foundation this country was built on because a few people are dead at the hands of some whackos. Big deal 250 were killed this year in "mass shootings", most of which were gang disagreements by the way. Yet 35K were killed in car accidents, 750K lives were lost in abortions, and 100's of thousands were killed by doctors and hospitals. Hunting doesn't work out to well with a pistol. Assault rifles, full auto, are already very restricted and primarily reserved for use by the military and law enforcement.
The latest Harvard/Harris poll is showing 63% of blacks and 61% of latinos are opposed to illegal immigration. This is understandable as the illegals pour into the poorer communities competing for jobs, causing lower wages, and housing, causing higher housing costs.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Wow you are far more left than me.
So funny. I guess you really aren't really conservative at all, you just worship Trump? Because he is a "winner" and you see yourself as part of that team?
I in no way would ever wish government bureaucracy to have so much power. Lol mental health/belief checks to be passed to buy a gun. I've had rightwing friends who I thought I agreed with on a lot, but then I started to realize so many of them are more like you then what I expect out of conservatives.
How fucking confused are you? Not that many people are blindly for illegal immigration. Mostly liberals just feel sorry for the people who are caught up in it and realize how hard they work and aren't bad people. They're also more fact driven. As a Trump supporter, I bet you have no clue that illegals commit fewer crimes than citizens? So deporting them doesn't seem like it'd lower the crime "rate", in fact it'd just raise it by simple math.
This poll says nothing and shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who actually tries to understand.
Most liberals are also smart enough to not want a stupid wall around the country for many many reasons I won't bother to enumerate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)