Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
Amazing that there is so much controversy over nothing. There is no proof that Singer used the bug or that even his method works. I'm waiting for someone to say "yes I followed Singer's method and it worked." You're all in an uproar over typical Internet talk.
I don't care if Rob Singer was using the double up bug or not. I just find the guy to be despicable and a nasty person with no redeeming traits. Since I don't care if he had knowledge of this bug when it was out there, I'll just assume he didn't because everything else considered it seems unlikely. If I am wrong it means absolutely 0 to my life. A freeroll if you will. He was known as being a huge liar before and desperately craves attention on this forum. The meta-evidence if you will suggests he is just full of shit.

Really though, not my argument.
You know what, accountinquestion, It is not my argument anymore either. I have made the case that Rob's SPS has always been complete voodoo and continues to be complete voodoo. I have always felt it is the responsibility of real AP's to call out complete voodoo like this . I have done my job. If there is still anybody buying this load of crap (slingshot) that is on them. I lead them to water.

Now the double up is a little different. Mathematically possible of course because someone executed it, got caught and should have been convicted of a crime. They only got away with it because the government overcharged them and couldn't make the case of which they charged. So Singer comes along 10 years later, seeking attention, which is all he does, and wants to say he found and played this crime first. Whatever. There is no evidence of that. He has provided no evidence and his long history of lying and making shit up says he didn't.

But no need for me to make that case any longer either. From comments on this forum, and ZERO comments at WoV after his claim was posted in his own words for the first time, I mean ZERO interest, it is pretty clear that there are one or two people in the AP/gambling community that believe Singer. And that's the way it should be. My job is done.

I mean imagine, this claim, which if true would be one of the biggest stories in the gambling/AP community, was posted at WOV, which was the first time most of those members had a chance to read it and they read that it was Singer making the claim, and clearly said "we have ZERO interest". THAT is funny shit! My job is done. Probably was done before I started. People know who Singer is. I didn't give them enough credit.