Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
There is an odd thing that has occurred several times now in this discussion. Fairly new member, Andrew has staked out a position, arguing the "impossibility" of several claims, Rob's and the "super duper count blackjack guy". So as I, and other try to explain just how unlikely these claims are, as Axel did a couple posts back with the 5% blackjack claim, Andrew will then respond with something to the effect that he is not really familiar with either Rob's claim or the blackjack 5% claim.

So the question begs, why is he staking a position and arguing then.
Is there anything more conspicuous than kew--someone who has created a false identity and life and has been banned from forums regularly across the internet--coming up with even more conspiracy theories just to bring needed attention to himself in order to feel relevant when he knows he isn't?

Admit it--THIS STUFF IS YOUR LIFE ��