Originally Posted by
Mission146
Coach,
I’m not confused or in denial as to your meaning, I was just being a smart ass in a polite way. No, I have not recently been evaluated for autism.
Redietz,
Sure thing, I’ll take a look at it as soon as I’m on the computer, on my phone atm.
Blackhole,
Nothing wrong with finding it interesting. People finding gambling interesting certainly benefits me, considering I write about gambling-related things.
Darkoz play takes a small number and turns it into a much larger number. By any metric, the RoI on that one is, in fact, outstanding. If you think it’s a, “Pathetic,” way to make money, you’re certainly entitled to think that way.
I don’t know what unprovable, “Bullshit,” you’re accusing people of talking. The APs on that board don’t really seem to talk shop too much at all, for the most part. As you see, many of them declared that they were leaving when serious shop started getting talked.
I’ll tell you this: if the goal is to convince people they can beat casinos, we’re not doing a particularly good job. It seems to me that every game Wizard analyzes, the result is a house edge working against the player. We mathematically disprove betting systems. If the goal was to pimp the online casinos and get people gambling, I’d say, “Hey, here’s x casino with y bonus offer on craps for new players, you should sign up and try your system there!”
Anyway, I’ll appraise an online casino promotion mathematically if someone asks, and I’ll also analyze the terms & conditions. If it sucks or is expected to lose, then I’ll say that. If it’s mathematically expected to win, then I’ll say that. It’s going in an article, though, no way am I going to take the time to fully analyze a promotion and not get paid for it.
Last article of the series should come out today or tomorrow. It’ll basically serve as response to the remainder of your post.