Originally Posted by MDawg View Post
Given that I've won every trip for two years now, if I joined the lawsuit and claimed that I'm being held from my winning tables, and my damages are based on my average win per trip, what data would the other side present against my win statements?

Theory? Would they jump up and down and say that Baccarat is unbeatable? At the end of the day I would have established that I did in fact win. Would theory even be admissible against fact?

At most, I'd think the other side would be able to introduce theory to claim that this man, should in theory lose on his next trip. And then it would be up to the jury to decide which evidence bears more weight - the facts of the past, or the theories of the future.

Just a comic thought, but not so different from what is going on today in gambling forums that are debating MDawg's impeccable gaming record.
Why did you quit from the higher stakes 10 years ago? Did you figure you were making to much money?