Originally Posted by
kewlJ
100% incorrect Redeitz. For PRACTICAL purposes there was No home team. For betting purposes there was as designated by the NFL.
As proof, If you had walked up to any sportsbook and asked For $110 wager on every home team, you would have lost Jacksonville.
KewlJ, if you want to count the game and results in the category of "Jacksonville being at home," that's great. The country needs more idiosyncratic sports gamblers. For those who actually care about their wagering, it goes into the category of "neutral field" and specifically "London."
If you go to any sports book manager and ask what home field advantage was assigned to Jacksonville for being the "home team" in London, you would be told zero. If I had been doing an interview and had been asked, "Who is the home team?" and answered, "Jacksonville is playing at home," I would have been called out as an idiot. So you are parsing words in a ridiculous fashion that serves nobody.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Oh yeah, you got the SF/Arizona result 100% wrong, but failed to acknowledge that for some reason.
You know, I took time out of my relatively busy Monday to report this here because I thought people would want to know it, not to toot my horn. Because anybody in the business is completely aware of it, but it hasn't gotten much mention in public. So kewlJ decides it didn't happen -- for the reasons Jacksonville, playing in London, was at home, and because he thought Arizona was favored over SF.
What the hell? Really? I broke my WoV self-banning to report it with my 51st post because I thought it was newsworthy and nobody mentioned it. I'm going to go over there and apologize for posting because kewlJ showed me the error of my report.
You guys are just full-out whack jobs.