Million Dollar Blackjack

[mickeycrimm]

So you don't remember the part where Rob teamed up with other mathematicians to check the accuracy of his strategy? And of course, win goals sometimes change the "correct" math.

"correct math" is not in Rob's vocabulary.

mickey, your silly bias makes you look so dumb. After I developed my play strategy following receiving two degrees grounded in advanced math and working in a technical fields for 25 years, I indeed did have 3 hard math guys review my approach. And as I've said many times, Franz Schaeffler (engineer from Rhode & Schwarz in Munich), another engineer friend of mine from the UAE, and a math professor friend in China all gave me their favourable opinions after they reviewed the strategy, for a healthy fee.

I know you think you know all "correct math" because you understand how to calculate gambling percentages. But people like me and the colleagues I've had throughout my career laugh at impersonators like you, and you probably can't even figure out why.

Next time wise up, and listen to sling.

Did they publish their findings so as to put them up for scrutiny by their peers?

[mickeycrimm]

There you go with insults, mickeycrimm, when you have nothing worthwhile to say. I used to think insults were beneath you.

You came first with that $6 an hour crap.

[The Boz]

There you go with insults, mickeycrimm, when you have nothing worthwhile to say. I used to think insults were beneath you.

Sorry Alan, not speaking for Mickey but you make it easy to bring out the worst in people.

You fucked you own son out of money. Something very few can say.

You sold your soul to scammers across SoCal using your former “reputation “ as a reporter to justify their scams taking advantage of hard working people. Again, how many can match that?

And through it all you show up at Red Rock 5-7 days a week to try and hit a Royal to turn 66 years of misery around.

And you claim Anything is beneath us?

[Alan Mendelson]

There you go with insults, mickeycrimm, when you have nothing worthwhile to say. I used to think insults were beneath you.

You came first with that $6 an hour crap.

No. Monet just posted about winning $6 or $8 an hour.

Please see his post #121 in Video Poker Plays.

[monet]

There you go with insults, mickeycrimm, when you have nothing worthwhile to say. I used to think insults were beneath you.

You came first with that $6 an hour crap.

No. Monet just posted about winning $6 or $8 an hour.

Please see his post #121 in Video Poker Plays.

This is the post/quote.
I am referring to the play at the current meter and I am giving a low estimate.
As the meter moves up or you wait for it to get higher you will earn more per hour.
Count on a .5% cash advantage along with a .6% comp add on.

Honestly though I haven't even read this thread and it doesn't really interest or pertain to me.
I have no idea what you guys are arguing about now but I noticed you were referring to a post I made on another thread.
Sorry to kewlJ for derailing or hijacking his thread.

"This bank is getting close to 100% flat.
Currently at 99.88% Return.
You could play it now and be over 100% when you count everything and add it up.
You could wait and let them push it up more.
Once it gets to 8000 coins or 4000 dollars you will have more competition.
This is why I like to jump on it earlier.
No matter what anyone says...
You will never lose on this game in the long run starting at a 6000 Coin Royal.
You will generate mail and eat for free.
Depending on how fast you play you should make 6 to 8 dollars per hour in the long run.
It gets better if you wait for the meter to move up but if you have nothing else to do...
or you need to keep your play up this is a decent entry point."

[Alan Mendelson]

Thanks monet. Mickeycrimm was grabbing at straws to bash me. I'm sorry you got involved.

[Moses]

KJ. Something happened that made me think of your situation. Let me know when you are back and I will PM you.

[kewlJ]

KJ. Something happened that made me think of your situation. Let me know when you are back and I will PM you.

Back? back from where? I haven't gone anywhere. Just see little value or benefit in participating and contributing here anymore. But you and anyone else are welcome to PM and/or email me any time.

[Moses]

Mr. V. In one of these threads you and Alan were talking about post divorce settlements. I have a question. Should I PM you? OR you might see fit to bill me.

[Moses]

California is a community property state, so presumably you'd keep whatever you had accrued before marriage, including defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans.

That wasn't the case for me. All assets were simply divided equally. This screwed me over good because I'd earned a great deal of money before we ever met and paid off her college loans etc. That law is the biggest screw job in the world. It's actually promotes divorce. The vows taken at the altar in front of God, friends, and family are a bunch of shit. It's the "sit on my ass and collect my half" law IMO.

My ex was part of an S farm corporation. Thus I and our family assets were part this because of marriage. I didn't know this before we were married. I was paying taxes on funds never received because it went back into the corporation. When her father died, the sons took over the farms operations and were basically runnning it into the ground. The kicker is our family assets were at risk because the land could not be borrowed against as part of the corporation. So she/we requested to be removed. There really wasn't a choice in the matter. I could not risk my kids educations, home equity, and investments at the hands of people operating a biz while intoxicated most of the time. Of course, I didn't realize a divorce was in my future.

Now one of the sons died and he willed his shares to my ex. The other son is in bad health so there is no one to run the farm. Consequently, it's being sold and she stands to make a large sum of money from the land. Her contribution to our family assets was minimal as she didn't work. It was on me and I handle it well. So, IF post divorce settlements are truly an option? I would like to recover the money paid for her student loans, my inheritance, funds earned before marriage, and perhaps consideration given to the fact I was 98% wage earner for 25 years.

[regnis]

Moses-sounds like bad representation from the beginning both relating to the divorce and the interest in the Farm. But V would probably know better if you can do anything at this time.

[Moses]

Moses-sounds like bad representation from the beginning both relating to the divorce and the interest in the Farm. But V would probably know better if you can do anything at this time.

Thanks regnis. It's a past I work hard to put out of my mind. But recent circumstances cause me to reflect.

I believe the real estate agent and my ex were in cahoots. But I was told all I could do was write a complaint to the real estate board.

The house sold in 30 days to a family who were members of the same church I was attending. The problem is the contract was drawn on a non contigent sale of their home. They came up to me after church one day and said they were sorry they couldn't buy the house because the buyers of their house were in a car accident. Problem was the contract wasn't contingent on the sale of their home. I wanted to let the agents mistake go, but my ex wanted restitution. So they had to pay a fee.

Also, we'd sold or moved moved everything in the house to my ex's apartment. So I was living in a huge house with a mattress and box spring and stuff no one else wanted for almost a year. The agent didn't disclose the previous owners spouse had committed suicide in that house. I found out years later from one of my daughters friends who said it was common knowledge in the community.

The agent also spoke to me about hearing from an attorney. How did she know it before me? She also told my ex to start charging me rent for a house I paid for in cash. Why? Putting more pressure on me would make it easier for her to sell the house. In July, a couple days before an open house, she said she would no longer be our agent. Not a problem, my neighbor had his own agency. However, she wanted to refer it to another agent in her office. I declined. So she went to my ex. to block the hiring of my neighbor. Thus we had no representation - so I listed the house for sale by owner.

I went back to Colorado in August to see my best friend to get my poop back in a group. This agent, who quit, bugged me nearly everyday about a potential buyer. Then, I had a a buyer. The agent went to that buyer and told him to low ball me on December 9 because she knew I didn't want to pay the upcoming tax bill. So the guy kept delaying and then offered $20K less on that day. I told him go get fucked and now I wouldn't sell the house to him at any price.

A doctor was moving into town and stopped by between Christmas and New Years to inquire about the house. We agreed on a price. Then he showed up later with an agent, referred by her and wanted me to pay the fees. I told him I would kill the deal over that money. Later, the agent bragged to me about the first guy and I learned later she was behind the second buyer as well.

The whole thing never made sense to me. Why not just keep the listing she already had in the first place? OR, if she was going to quit. Then why not quit and walk away?

[mickeycrimm]

"correct math" is not in Rob's vocabulary.

mickey, your silly bias makes you look so dumb. After I developed my play strategy following receiving two degrees grounded in advanced math and working in a technical fields for 25 years, I indeed did have 3 hard math guys review my approach. And as I've said many times, Franz Schaeffler (engineer from Rhode & Schwarz in Munich), another engineer friend of mine from the UAE, and a math professor friend in China all gave me their favourable opinions after they reviewed the strategy, for a healthy fee.

I know you think you know all "correct math" because you understand how to calculate gambling percentages. But people like me and the colleagues I've had throughout my career laugh at impersonators like you, and you probably can't even figure out why.

Next time wise up, and listen to sling.

Did they publish their findings so as to put them up for scrutiny by their peers?

Bump.

[Alan Mendelson]

I have a question for Rob.

What did your math experts actually confirm?

It appears to me that everyone is looking for the confirmation of the math experts you consulted but I don't recall ever seeing what they were supposed to confirm?

The only math I have ever seen is about the expected return of Rob's Special Plays, and Rob admits each has a lower expected value than the conventional play.

What other math questions are there?

[mickeycrimm]

I have a question for Rob.

What did your math experts actually confirm?

It appears to me that everyone is looking for the confirmation of the math experts you consulted but I don't recall ever seeing what they were supposed to confirm?

The only math I have ever seen is about the expected return of Rob's Special Plays, and Rob admits each has a lower expected value than the conventional play.

What other math questions are there?

Alan, Rob's math experts exist only in his mind.

[Rob.Singer]

I have a question for Rob.

What did your math experts actually confirm?

It appears to me that everyone is looking for the confirmation of the math experts you consulted but I don't recall ever seeing what they were supposed to confirm?

The only math I have ever seen is about the expected return of Rob's Special Plays, and Rob admits each has a lower expected value than the conventional play.

What other math questions are there?

They confirmed/commented on/recommended changes on the entirety of what I ran past them. For instance;
I asked about my calculations for the different games I'd play and how they'd be affected by the special plays, and if I should use different session win goals based on those multiple scenarios. One of them came up with the point that I didn't need to play the $100 machines if I were a certain amount ahead of my yearly win goal's weekly avg. Etc.

[mickeycrimm]

I have a question for Rob.

What did your math experts actually confirm?

It appears to me that everyone is looking for the confirmation of the math experts you consulted but I don't recall ever seeing what they were supposed to confirm?

The only math I have ever seen is about the expected return of Rob's Special Plays, and Rob admits each has a lower expected value than the conventional play.

What other math questions are there?

They confirmed/commented on/recommended changes on the entirety of what I ran past them. For instance;
I asked about my calculations for the different games I'd play and how they'd be affected by the special plays, and if I should use different session win goals based on those multiple scenarios. One of them came up with the point that I didn't need to play the $100 machines if I were a certain amount ahead of my yearly win goal's weekly avg. Etc.

Show us the calculations you made.

[MaxPen]

2+2= potatoe

Little Wobbie is a Tard.

[jbjb]

I have a question for Rob.

What did your math experts actually confirm?

It appears to me that everyone is looking for the confirmation of the math experts you consulted but I don't recall ever seeing what they were supposed to confirm?

The only math I have ever seen is about the expected return of Rob's Special Plays, and Rob admits each has a lower expected value than the conventional play.

What other math questions are there?

They confirmed/commented on/recommended changes on the entirety of what I ran past them. For instance;
I asked about my calculations for the different games I'd play and how they'd be affected by the special plays, and if I should use different session win goals based on those multiple scenarios. One of them came up with the point that I didn't need to play the $100 machines if I were a certain amount ahead of my yearly win goal's weekly avg. Etc.

Show us the calculations you made.

There are none. Nor are/were there these supposed "mathematicians." It's all just smoke up peoples asses! Rob is nothing but a WAG or SWAG player....Wild Assed Guessing or Systematic Wild Assed Guessing.

[Rob.Singer]

I have a question for Rob.

What did your math experts actually confirm?

It appears to me that everyone is looking for the confirmation of the math experts you consulted but I don't recall ever seeing what they were supposed to confirm?

The only math I have ever seen is about the expected return of Rob's Special Plays, and Rob admits each has a lower expected value than the conventional play.

What other math questions are there?

They confirmed/commented on/recommended changes on the entirety of what I ran past them. For instance;
I asked about my calculations for the different games I'd play and how they'd be affected by the special plays, and if I should use different session win goals based on those multiple scenarios. One of them came up with the point that I didn't need to play the $100 machines if I were a certain amount ahead of my yearly win goal's weekly avg. Etc.

Show us the calculations you made.

I thought you were gonna say "show us your passports that prove you were in these countries".

IE, you're such an idiot asking for calculations none of you--especially you--would comprehend, and were from 20 years ago.