Extended Version for those that care...
Extended Version for those that care...
Wrong, Crimm. I debunk sports betting claims. When it comes to hard-core formal debunking, I stick to what I know. Back when you were debunking Rob's video poker, I let you have the floor because it wasn't my area of expertise. Remember that?
I've debunked sports betting nonsense since USA Today first started publishing and allowed two full pages of sports ads in their initial Friday editions. I called them. I wrote to them. Long time ago. No Rob Singer in sight.
When "Money Talks" went on the air, I contacted the network to shoot it down. I warned them it was bullshit. That's 40 years later. No Rob Singer involved in that one, either.
And in between, I've debunked as much nonsense as I could, including Mr. Singer when he made sports claims. I had a debunking essay published in The Humanist in 1984. No Singer in sight for that one, either.
I have been doing this a long, long time.
You're dead wrong, mickey. You should admit as much, but you don't have the integrity. It's embarrassing.
Basically, everything you just said about me in your post was bullshitting on your part. As usual. You don't even bother to check facts. Mickey Crimm -- the bullshit champ.
All these years in all these forums, find a spot where I was actively posting and let sports betting bullshit slide. I even called Shackleford out on his parlay calculator nonsense, which wasn't a scam or a lie -- it was just bad gambling.
Last edited by redietz; 12-02-2022 at 01:48 AM.
Still waiting for your complete list of GOOD reasons not to use an alias.
I still don't understand why having a parlay calculator as a tool is "bad gambling". There are oodles of +EV parlay situations that are only possible if you use parlays. I don't care who makes the product if it's useful, it's useful. I can't imagine any gambling calculator being "bad gambling" All those calculators come in handy and can be used for +EV at one time or another, I don't care if the casino game has a 25%+ HA those games too can create a +EV situation and therefore making those tools useful. Perhaps a bookie might want to use that parlay tool to make sure he isn't giving out +EV parlay situations.
Sure, 99% of the people using those tools are not using them for +EV situations and perhaps you can equate that with "bad gambling"
99% of the people out there probably don't beat sports so perhaps talking about how you beat football is "Bad gambling"
Yes, imagine.
You already told everyone, you are dishonest, lie and cheat whenever you can, Pudge. No need to prove it by lying. . Because that is not what happened yesterday. In the real word, which I posted about, I made the bet online from my phone. I am sure I pushed the wrong button on a small screen. Big whoop...I made a mistake and shared that experience honestly. Compare that to a guy who makes his public picks and when it loses, says, "Oh I didn't bet it anyway". THAT is Rob Singer type bullshit!
About a VPN, I thought a VPN meant that NO IP showed up when Admins looked for IP. I thought Admins saw something like,"This Poster's IP Address is not available." When I made my first WOV Sock after being banned as Kentry, I tried to do a VPN and was caught and banned after my first and only post as that Sock.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7
Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.
Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.
Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.
I am glad to get my full posting rights back! Thank you Dan!
I agree, I think Singer does much of what he does for these reasons.
In life there are some people that have an irresistible desire to accomplish something. For example, for some that desire may be to cure cancer. For many, no matter how much they “want it”, it will never happen due to many factors such as: intelligence, skill level, patience, and most of all “Luck”. Yes, Luck is a major factor in success, especially for something that is difficult to accomplish.
I believe long before Rob had his gig at Gaming Today, he was obsessed with being a long term winning gambler, and if he couldn’t do that, the next best thing was for people to believe he was a winning gambler. Obviously this has been done with many lies over the years.
Once he started with Gaming Today, in his mind this gave him credibility. Were there people who believed he was a winning VP player at this time? Yes, primarily due to the reputation of GT as well as what ReDietz mentioned (no internet at this time). During this period, he had built up an artificial belief that he was a winning VP player with his non-math VP strategies.
Once the gaming today gig came to an end, his primarily outlet for preaching his advice was gone. Going back to Singers life long obsession with being a winning long term gambler, the GT gig temporarily made him content. Pre internet there wasn’t many public outlets to call out someone’s bullshit. After GT and the internet becoming widely assessable, it was a double whammy for Mr. Singer. He still had his fascination with long term winning gamblers, and since he couldn’t actually be one, he did the next best thing... PRETEND to be one. For a few decades now that’s what he has been doing... Pretending.
With GT he didn’t have to put much into his lies. He carried that same lackadaisical attitude with him, not realizing it will no longer work. For some reason he still gets upset when people don’t believe his stories.
I think with his last story he sat around thinking of how he could come up with the ultimate casino win that HE thought wouldn’t be able to be debunked. He showed a picture of a VP “win”. Everyone knew he did not win. I knew the second I looked at it, what it was. A picture taken at his house lol. Others such as Max Pen and Druff offered to meet and of course something always happens with Singer, so there is an excuse not to meet.
I think this forum has some smart people, some very smart AP’s. He realizes his false claims won’t stand over here.
Everyone, including Singer would agree that there is nothing he wants more than for people to believe he hit that large VP score. We can resolve this in less than a day. I have a wager for you. Since you probably think Druff is bias, we both send Shackleford $5,500 as an escrow. 5k for the wager and $500 each for his services. He can sign an NDA, you take Shackleford to the casino you won at. If he verifies it you get my 5k, but more importantly you will be vindicated! You want people to believe you are a winning gambler more than anything in life.
BTW, I’m positive Singer didn’t win that VP hit. The reason Im offering only 5k is because I feel it’s the perfect amount. It severely limits the possibilities of any Shenanigans going on. It’s a wager I’m willing to take, but let’s see what nonsense Singer comes up with.
Last edited by PositiveVariance; 12-02-2022 at 11:11 AM.
I made one real window error in my life. About 40 years ago, I said San Diego when I meant San Francisco.
Technically, I also claimed that I made an error when Harrah's refused to give me a hamburger comp after a $4500 bet, telling me I needed to bet $5500. And nobody but me was in the sports book! Since I had never left the window, I knew it was within my rights to say I had made an error, and I also knew Rio had identical numbers, so I said I had made an error and wanted my money back.
I then took my money, went to the Rio, and bet the same thing, but got a buffet comped. Dan would have been proud of me.
I am offended by this unsupported accusation Positive Variance. I have seen a picture of the stacks of money that Rob won that day. Why would the world's greatest "gambler", a guy who won 2.9 million dollars playing the double-up bug lie about such a thing? And don't you dare try to tell me he didn't win 2.9 million playing the DU bug. I have seen the evidence, a picture of Rob sitting high in the driver's seat of the 1.5 Newell RV he bought with that money (strangly the picture is at a RV dealership, but I am sure that can be explained), along with the bill of sales for that same vehicle with no company logo and all signatures in the same handwriting. So I KNOW he won that 2.9 M playing the DU bug.
Next you will try to tell us Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny aren't real either.
Now kidding aside, I greatly appreciate your professional approach PositiveVariance. You are an asset to this forum. Your dissecting of Rob's jackpot picture was fair and precise.
I did want to mention, I think it was last week, I was looking at the Las Vegas Review Journal's website, which I don't visit all that regularly. There was a news story, I wanted to read that day, so I logged on. In their gambling section, there was a story about 2 different low 6 figure jackpots that had been hit in Vegas that week. They listed the casinos and one they listed a player's name, the second one they said the player didn't want to be identified. These stories are often picked up by websites like VitalVegas as well. So my point is Casinos report these kinds of wins. It is good publicity. The player can request not to be named, but the jackpot is still reported and picked up by several interested news sources. There was no suck jackpot reported any where near the time of Rob Singers claim.
Oh, and I would be careful about any wager with Rob Singer. Such a wager will never come down, because he will never put any money in escrow with anyone. Instead what will happen is he will change the already agreed upon terms numerous times until he hits on something the other party cannot accept and then he will start screaming how they backed out of the bet.
We have all seen it a dozen times...most of you probably way more than a dozen. Rob Singer is like a really bad movie or TV show that you watch the re-run of over and over and then ask yourself why?
KewlJ, You mean to tell me Jackpots that are hit in someone’s basement are not reported???
So instead of a w2-g and cash do you get a fist bump from the "slot" attendant (aka daughter) who is overlooking your masterpiece?
"Hey dad thats cool you learned how to use photoshop."
"Ok dad will you now PLEASE mow the lawn. You know, you eat a lot of food."
"Father, I told you a hundred times by now, no one on that stupid forum cares about this shit."
"Could you please stop fucking around on the computer and get rid of all these goddam Gambling Times taking up all this goddam space."
"I didn't get to go to college because you wasted all your fucking money on this gambling shit. You're still at it. GIVE IT UP."
"I told you I'd let you use Ralphie's internet in the basement but not if you prevent him from doing his homework.."
"Why don't you work on fixing your RV's heater like you said last week."
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
Now coach, let me do the Socratic thing. If you have read Singer's GF posts, as I suspect you have on occasion, you know he's reading posts here. He comments on myriad things posted here that, if he were not reading them, he'd know nothing about. So posting something there as opposed to here has little effect on whether he's read it.
Second, and even more Socratic, since he reads it here, what posting it there will accomplish is making it more likely he will RESPOND to it. Rob isn't banned here -- he just seems cowed here. Nothing prevents him from responding here.
Just dotting the i's for you, coach. I figure you're just testing us to ensure that we keep up with your Socratic method.
Now coach, let me continue your Socratic method.
Are you arguing that Rob hasn't read anything here in his posting absence? Are you saying he hasn't read posts here regarding him? Are you saying he hasn't posted at GF regarding what has been posted here regarding him? Are you saying he can't post here?
What exactly are you saying regarding Rob's awareness of posts on this forum?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)