Originally Posted by
redietz
what is your rationale for not wanting a fine upstanding person such as myself
I don't have a rationale, anybody who tewlj appoints as his witness is fine by me.
I support the appointment of whomever the participants designate, but it's up to them to agree about who is acceptable.
Originally Posted by
redietz
Last I checked, it was the MDawg Challenge, not the kewlJ challenge.
See, you'll have to start a kewlJ challenge up yourself.
I don't think I will, ditz. You see, time passes...things change.
If tewlj wants to witness, film and display 20 sessions of MDawg's play, then it's fair that he agrees to have 20 sessions of his own sessions witnessed, filmed and displayed as well.
If tewlj declines those conditions, then we should expect MDawg to decline to participate, and the status quo maintained.
I prefer the sessions to be witnessed, etc.
But that won't happen unless tewlj accepts fairness and cooperates.