Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 99

Thread: A challenge to Redietz

  1. #61
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post

    Like I said-futility talking to a die hard skeptic.
    Rob's short terms add up to one big long term. You've got to be really stupid not to understand that.
    I am too impatient to remain in a casino over 2 hrs- notwithstanding the smoke and cold temps. Usually 2 artt sessions is enough. I've tried more, but most of the time end up going backwards and getting bored.
    Sling, according to Rob, you are doing it wrong. You have to take the money you won in the first session home and sit on it for a week. Don't forget to tag the building. Then go back and play. You can't win two sessions in a row on the same day. It has to be a week apart. Ask Rob.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  2. #62
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Hang on a second mickeycrimm. All Rob is saying is that sometimes the sub optimal hold will come through with a bigger paying hand. For example, sometimes dropping the full house and going for the quads will give you the quads. That's all he's saying. Don't blow it up out of proportion. As he has said he doesn't do it all the time.

    Remember his $50k win when he did NOT use a special play and followed conventional strategy.
    But according to Rob you can't win using conventional strategy.l
    Wrong again Mickeycrimm. Rob uses conventional strategy more than 95% of the time. His special plays are used less than 5% of the time.

  3. #63
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Hang on a second mickeycrimm. All Rob is saying is that sometimes the sub optimal hold will come through with a bigger paying hand. For example, sometimes dropping the full house and going for the quads will give you the quads. That's all he's saying. Don't blow it up out of proportion. As he has said he doesn't do it all the time.

    Remember his $50k win when he did NOT use a special play and followed conventional strategy.
    But according to Rob you can't win using conventional strategy.l
    Wrong again Mickeycrimm. Rob uses conventional strategy more than 95% of the time. His special plays are used less than 5% of the time.
    Okay. Then according to Rob you can't win unless you use special plays 5% of the time.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  4. #64
    Alan- we're being played again. Time to leave.

  5. #65
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Rob's short terms add up to one big long term. You've got to be really stupid not to understand that.
    I am too impatient to remain in a casino over 2 hrs- notwithstanding the smoke and cold temps. Usually 2 artt sessions is enough. I've tried more, but most of the time end up going backwards and getting bored.
    Sling, according to Rob, you are doing it wrong. You have to take the money you won in the first session home and sit on it for a week. Don't forget to tag the building. Then go back and play. You can't win two sessions in a row on the same day. It has to be a week apart. Ask Rob.
    mickey you have no education, so leave the explaining to others that do.

    The "tag the building" cry was part of what got Fezzik into trouble and ultimately, humiliated.

    You don't take the money that's been won home, and sit on it. You deposit the money that's won, then begin a new session whenever you choose. I chose to win minimum $2500/week, then drive home because I have something called a FAMILY. You know, something you've failed at your entire wasted life. The amount of required time between sessions is nothing but another of your lies.

    Go out and find a girlfriend along with some dignity.

  6. #66
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post

    I am too impatient to remain in a casino over 2 hrs- notwithstanding the smoke and cold temps. Usually 2 artt sessions is enough. I've tried more, but most of the time end up going backwards and getting bored.
    Sling, according to Rob, you are doing it wrong. You have to take the money you won in the first session home and sit on it for a week. Don't forget to tag the building. Then go back and play. You can't win two sessions in a row on the same day. It has to be a week apart. Ask Rob.
    mickey you have no education, so leave the explaining to others that do.

    The "tag the building" cry was part of what got Fezzik into trouble and ultimately, humiliated.

    You don't take the money that's been won home, and sit on it. You deposit the money that's won, then begin a new session whenever you choose. I chose to win minimum $2500/week, then drive home because I have something called a FAMILY. You know, something you've failed at your entire wasted life. The amount of required time between sessions is nothing but another of your lies.

    Go out and find a girlfriend along with some dignity.
    Remember the dude you taught who won money his first session but blew it all back and more in the 2nd session while you were sitting there watching. You blamed it on him playing two sessions in one day. He went against your advice, remember. And Rob....don't forget to tag the building.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  7. #67
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Sling, according to Rob, you are doing it wrong. You have to take the money you won in the first session home and sit on it for a week. Don't forget to tag the building. Then go back and play. You can't win two sessions in a row on the same day. It has to be a week apart. Ask Rob.
    mickey you have no education, so leave the explaining to others that do.

    The "tag the building" cry was part of what got Fezzik into trouble and ultimately, humiliated.

    You don't take the money that's been won home, and sit on it. You deposit the money that's won, then begin a new session whenever you choose. I chose to win minimum $2500/week, then drive home because I have something called a FAMILY. You know, something you've failed at your entire wasted life. The amount of required time between sessions is nothing but another of your lies.

    Go out and find a girlfriend along with some dignity.
    Remember the dude you taught who won money his first session but blew it all back and more in the 2nd session while you were sitting there watching. You blamed it on him playing two sessions in one day. He went against your advice, remember. And Rob....don't forget to tag the building.
    Wasn't that also the guy who went UP in denomination after a big win? I get what's going on here. I have to admit it takes imagination to twist every incident. I'm outta here for a while..

  8. #68
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    mickey you have no education, so leave the explaining to others that do.

    The "tag the building" cry was part of what got Fezzik into trouble and ultimately, humiliated.

    You don't take the money that's been won home, and sit on it. You deposit the money that's won, then begin a new session whenever you choose. I chose to win minimum $2500/week, then drive home because I have something called a FAMILY. You know, something you've failed at your entire wasted life. The amount of required time between sessions is nothing but another of your lies.

    Go out and find a girlfriend along with some dignity.
    Remember the dude you taught who won money his first session but blew it all back and more in the 2nd session while you were sitting there watching. You blamed it on him playing two sessions in one day. He went against your advice, remember. And Rob....don't forget to tag the building.
    Wasn't that also the guy who went UP in denomination after a big win? I get what's going on here. I have to admit it takes imagination to twist every incident. I'm outta here for a while..
    Get your nose out of Rob's ass.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  9. #69
    Everytime I hear the term special plays regarding this morons strategy all I can think of is special Ed. I convert it to Special Rob though. Going to have to start referring to MendleFool, Dinger, and SlappingHisJunk as the Special Play Helmet Crew.

  10. #70
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Everytime I hear the term special plays regarding this morons strategy all I can think of is special Ed. I convert it to Special Rob though. Going to have to start referring to MendleFool, Dinger, and SlappingHisJunk as the Special Play Helmet Crew.
    Your post is funny!
    I think MendleFool is the weakest though.
    So many better choices.
    I still like Mendlebread the best, thanks kewlJ!
    However, so many to choose from.

    I like the idea of thinking about Sanford and Son and of course Fred's Son: The Big Dummy!
    Mendle and Son!
    MendleFunk isn't so bad either.
    Ungrateful little bastard charging his father an extreme amount of money to do little work that he should be doing for free anyways.
    If that isn't bad enough he has to come into the forums and post his private life and text messages for everyone to read and never forget.

    You just can't make these three Fools happy.
    They ask for peanut butter and you give them peanut butter and they say they wanted Chopped Liver.
    Of course if you know anything about Chopped Liver it has to be Kosher.

  11. #71
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Everytime I hear the term special plays regarding this morons strategy all I can think of is special Ed. I convert it to Special Rob though. Going to have to start referring to MendleFool, Dinger, and SlappingHisJunk as the Special Play Helmet Crew.
    Nice trolling post, asshole. But I don't use Rob's special plays. Fuck off.

  12. #72
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Everytime I hear the term special plays regarding this morons strategy all I can think of is special Ed. I convert it to Special Rob though. Going to have to start referring to MendleFool, Dinger, and SlappingHisJunk as the Special Play Helmet Crew.
    Nice trolling post, asshole. But I don't use Rob's special plays. Fuck off.
    Ya, you use your own special plays(we have seen it from your videos) and they are even worse and more often than his.

  13. #73
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Everytime I hear the term special plays regarding this morons strategy all I can think of is special Ed. I convert it to Special Rob though. Going to have to start referring to MendleFool, Dinger, and SlappingHisJunk as the Special Play Helmet Crew.
    Nice trolling post, asshole. But I don't use Rob's special plays. Fuck off.
    Ya, you use your own special plays(we have seen it from your videos) and they are even worse and more often than his.
    Exactly!

  14. #74
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Sling, according to Rob, you are doing it wrong. You have to take the money you won in the first session home and sit on it for a week. Don't forget to tag the building. Then go back and play. You can't win two sessions in a row on the same day. It has to be a week apart. Ask Rob.
    mickey you have no education, so leave the explaining to others that do.

    The "tag the building" cry was part of what got Fezzik into trouble and ultimately, humiliated.

    You don't take the money that's been won home, and sit on it. You deposit the money that's won, then begin a new session whenever you choose. I chose to win minimum $2500/week, then drive home because I have something called a FAMILY. You know, something you've failed at your entire wasted life. The amount of required time between sessions is nothing but another of your lies.

    Go out and find a girlfriend along with some dignity.
    Remember the dude you taught who won money his first session but blew it all back and more in the 2nd session while you were sitting there watching. You blamed it on him playing two sessions in one day. He went against your advice, remember. And Rob....don't forget to tag the building.
    Never heard of that mickey. Maybe you should study to get your high school diploma before saying anything else

  15. #75
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    I don't use Rob's special plays.
    Perhaps, but in defending him and having given him free air time at your site you come off as endorsing him and his controversial methods.
    What, Me Worry?

  16. #76
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    mickey you have no education, so leave the explaining to others that do.

    The "tag the building" cry was part of what got Fezzik into trouble and ultimately, humiliated.

    You don't take the money that's been won home, and sit on it. You deposit the money that's won, then begin a new session whenever you choose. I chose to win minimum $2500/week, then drive home because I have something called a FAMILY. You know, something you've failed at your entire wasted life. The amount of required time between sessions is nothing but another of your lies.

    Go out and find a girlfriend along with some dignity.
    Remember the dude you taught who won money his first session but blew it all back and more in the 2nd session while you were sitting there watching. You blamed it on him playing two sessions in one day. He went against your advice, remember. And Rob....don't forget to tag the building.
    Never heard of that mickey. Maybe you should study to get your high school diploma before saying anything else
    You are the one that's uneducated. You can't converse about any kind of strategic gambling here because you are ignorant to it. All you can do is cast aspersions but it doesn't cover up for your total lack of gambling logic. Third graders know more about it than you do.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  17. #77
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Remember the dude you taught who won money his first session but blew it all back and more in the 2nd session while you were sitting there watching. You blamed it on him playing two sessions in one day. He went against your advice, remember. And Rob....don't forget to tag the building.
    Never heard of that mickey. Maybe you should study to get your high school diploma before saying anything else
    You are the one that's uneducated. You can't converse about any kind of strategic gambling here because you are ignorant to it. All you can do is cast aspersions but it doesn't cover up for your total lack of gambling logic. Third graders know more about it than you do.
    Not sure about 3rd graders but could definitely be convinced to agree. I am 100% sure about 5th graders though. This Bozo Rob should take some of his own advice and WISE UP.

  18. #78
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    Never heard of that mickey. Maybe you should study to get your high school diploma before saying anything else
    You are the one that's uneducated. You can't converse about any kind of strategic gambling here because you are ignorant to it. All you can do is cast aspersions but it doesn't cover up for your total lack of gambling logic. Third graders know more about it than you do.
    Not sure about 3rd graders but could definitely be convinced to agree. I am 100% sure about 5th graders though. This Bozo Rob should take some of his own advice and WISE UP.
    Makes me think of these guys getting on this bus...

    Dumb n Dumberer


  19. #79
    It's funny watching one illiterate with no high school diploma who likes to think knowing a few things about gambling is the meaning of life, and other anonymous illiterates too afraid to identify their incompetence, try to debate.

    How about this mickey....put some of that "six figures a year" on the line: My 3 diplomas against yours. And don't try to escape with your nonsensical walking/talking two-bit bum rap about how you got your education from the streets. My education came from hi-profile universities, and still, my "street smarts" make yours look like Pee-Wee Herman's lemonade stand.

    Wise up you deadbeat punk

  20. #80
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    It's funny watching one illiterate with no high school diploma who likes to think knowing a few things about gambling is the meaning of life, and other anonymous illiterates too afraid to identify their incompetence, try to debate.

    How about this mickey....put some of that "six figures a year" on the line: My 3 diplomas against yours. And don't try to escape with your nonsensical walking/talking two-bit bum rap about how you got your education from the streets. My education came from hi-profile universities, and still, my "street smarts" make yours look like Pee-Wee Herman's lemonade stand.

    Wise up you deadbeat punk
    3 degrees and nothing but a broke idiot that files bankruptcy. Wise up!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Here's a reminder for Redietz and everyone else
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-11-2018, 03:58 PM
  2. $25k challenge
    By Rob.Singer in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 277
    Last Post: 08-25-2018, 06:48 AM
  3. Replies: 62
    Last Post: 12-22-2017, 12:02 AM
  4. Redietz Credibility package
    By regnis in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-12-2017, 10:10 PM
  5. Compare THIS Challenge To The Fedomalley Challenge
    By Rob.Singer in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-29-2011, 11:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •