Apologies for the double post.
This thread has become interesting enough for me to bring forth the Omar Siddiqui case.
Through a kickback scheme with vendors in the late 2000's, Mr. Siddiqui stole more than $60 million from his employer, Fry's Electronics, to gamble and lose as a whale in Las Vegas.
General Case Story
6 years in prison for stealing $60 million
Is it OK for the casinos to keep that $60 million since it would be considered taking full advantage of the the moral failings (or perhaps a moral "glitch") of a compulsive gambler? If so, then why
wouldn't it be OK for Kane and Nestor to take full advantage of a software glitch by the casino (and perhaps IGT) to the tune of a relatively paltry $400,000 or so?
Sometimes I have to wonder whether these "moral rules" only apply to the little people, but not large, powerful entities (which helps to keep those big entities big!).
PS. 6 years in prison for a $60 million heist is also a crazy light sentence, but that's beside the point here.
PPS. OK,
now I go. Happy Thanksgiving!