In my time on the forum, there have been two outrageously ridiculous claims that distanced themselves far above all the other lies.
In first place and really far above anything else, is the claim of seeing 18 y.o.'s in a row. Just preposterous.
In second place is the claim of making a million dollars playing negative EV poker. That will and a progression system can magically turn a negative expectation game into a long-term positive expectation game. You can argue that while in second place this is the more dangerous of the two because it's purpose is to intentionally, fraudulently mislead players and could end up costing people money.
But suddenly...we have a new contender......
I have a degree or two in math. AND THEN SOME. I mean he doesn't even know if he has one or two degrees. (in fact he has zero)
He might as well of said "I got me a bucket full of smarts". LMAO!
No one will ever top the 18 yos in a row balony. It stands head and shoulders above any load of shit that anyone could ever dream of coming up with.
When you use a private background check service for which you have paid little or nothing, you are beholden to not use the information as an employment check, rental credit verification, and so on. The information is not guaranteed and therefore cannot be used for purposes that could put it at cross-purposes with federal law, such as a means to disqualify a renter. You also cannot publicly present the information, as that breaks the terms of the agreement.
Is the information likely correct? Well, sure. The auto-online searches are basically the equivalent of what most private investigators did 30 years ago. Is it guaranteed if a federal lawsuit is brought? No.
How can you guarantee it? You hire a private investigator to flesh it out and pin down all of the details. That is pricey. If you find information on a somebody who, for example, has a matching age and residential history with your person in question, that is almost undoubtedly your person in question. But the inexpensive online searches don't guarantee it, and you can't (or shouldn't) copy and paste the results because it's the search service's intellectual property.
My money says Prince Harry gets layed tonight.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I have to confess that I don't read all of this forum. Just the items that catch my eye in passing, or some things that I look for.
Did KJ get around to telling us how many casinos he's been tossed from, if he can count, etc, at all? Or to the reason he drags his mother around with him? How about that food stamp business by Singer?
Just for you, KJ, I'll post up my grade-13 transcripts. At a bargain price. I averaged, if I recall, 98.6 over 6 of 8 grade-13 level courses, the number of courses as required for university admission. (It was a tough school, but good practice for another. Sigh. In any event, degrees and the like mean little to me. They are nice to have, but I don't care about one or two or more here or there.) What have you to put up? How about a $1,000? Is my identity worth $1,000 to you, the guy who makes that in one sitting. How about your grade-13 certificate?
Of course, your other option is to run and hide, again. Think it over. "Make my day," please.
Last edited by Bill Yung; 05-19-2018 at 08:28 AM.
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
LOL -- I had better averages than that, Bill. Just sayin'. And I don't have to skip any categories.
Meanwhile, obviously if anyone has a real (as opposed to a "gotcha" debate) interest in the public information accessing, they can pull up the rules and liabilities in a minute or two. Obviously, some people already did that.
I'm ready to post mine. Are you?
Oh, Redietz, where did you go?
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
That's quite a bit of knowledge about that redietz, however, I already gave kew permission to post his food stamp fraud claim. What's funny is if that were true then how on earth would he ever stumble thru the explanation about my having too much money to qualify for them! I mean, what about his claim that I steal electricity for my RV?
Now you're beginning to see why the little fairy's head keeps spinning around in dizzying circles. First it's "I'm a blackjack pro who makes a living outsmarting casinos by staying under their radar in LV while counting multiple decks being constantly shuffled on 2 tables at a time....and I can lose $8800 in a day but feel good about it because I banked a whole lot of PHANTOM BUCKS since, you know, that's what us ap's do....but fans please don't worry about me because I'm now DUE and I just KNOW I'll win in the future because, well, that's ALSO what us ap's do!"
Kew came here for 2 reasons: to take his pretend gambling life over to another forum after being excoriated by a collection of liberal weirdos, in order to feel relevant once again. And, to whine and moan and groan and non-stop bellyache about Wizard.
As a result, he's made himself quite the whipping post here, and he deserves every bit of it. And why he thought anyone anywhere would pile on the sympathy and begin to believe his blackjack BS just because he claims some made-up queer lover croaks, only exacerbates his phony-baloney anonymous character.
Says the jackass challenging others to a pissing contest over grades in school. Lol. You and all your sockpuppets and identies have some real issues.
Funny isn't it, how all the trolliest of these frauds all have many sockpuppets. Multiple identities. Some real mental issues going on here.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
KJ, you say you've enlisted your mother to drive you around now since your former driver died.
I assume you pay her for her time; if so, how much?
I ask so that you can compare the expense to what you'd pay if you used Uber or Lyft.
Why should your mother be on call for you 24/7 when a viable much less intrusive alternative exists?
What, is this some form of payback against her?
Passive/aggressive gamemanship?
Makes no sense; she has a life of her own and should be allowed to live it without having to prop you up.
What, Me Worry?
I checked the rules and liabilities for some cheap ($30 or less) or free personal info searches. No mystery to that.
Regarding posting of Grade 13 scores, I have to admit I don't even know what Grade 13 is. And I'm not sure who is supposed to care. I'm sure I have some fine old IQ tests floating around, and I was a merit scholar, if that means anything (it doesn't, really). I'm not sure what the problem is -- I take Bill Yung's word that he has multiple math degrees. Why would he lie?
There are currently 255 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 254 guests)