Recent interview with Eliot Jacobson

[accountinquestion]

yes it's quite humorous to thank someone for posting a video.

It is kind of funny.
Most of these knuckleheads will say God does not exist.
Nothing happens to you when you die.
Therefore, it makes no difference what actions you choose in life as you have no repercussions.
However, we are all going to die from global warming in the next 12 years.
Talk about LOL.

Monet, it's always best to believe whatever someone decides to ram down your throat. For example the illegal drug use and prostitute content on Hunter Biden's laptop was just fake news. I know that because CNN told me that. Also everyone knows a person just can't make any money at casinos. And, so what if during the most recent U.S. presidential election people were caught on camera stuffing thousands of absentee ballots into ballot drop off sites at 2:00AM to 3:00 AM with gloves on even though it is illegal to drop even one absentee ballot into a drop off box if it is not your own. It's all just conspiratorial nonsense. Everyone goes to drop boxes at 2AM in the morning with gloves on.

Really grasping at straws are we?

[tableplay]

It is kind of funny.
Most of these knuckleheads will say God does not exist.
Nothing happens to you when you die.
Therefore, it makes no difference what actions you choose in life as you have no repercussions.
However, we are all going to die from global warming in the next 12 years.
Talk about LOL.

Monet, it's always best to believe whatever someone decides to ram down your throat. For example the illegal drug use and prostitute content on Hunter Biden's laptop was just fake news. I know that because CNN told me that. Also everyone knows a person just can't make any money at casinos. And, so what if during the most recent U.S. presidential election people were caught on camera stuffing thousands of absentee ballots into ballot drop off sites at 2:00AM to 3:00 AM with gloves on even though it is illegal to drop even one absentee ballot into a drop off box if it is not your own. It's all just conspiratorial nonsense. Everyone goes to drop boxes at 2AM in the morning with gloves on.

Really grasping at straws are we?

And if someone posts probabilistic nonsense because of a mistaken belief that next hand UX multipliers are generated on the deal and not on the draw so what. It can all just be brushed aside with a "whoops, I made a mistake" followed by a 180 degree topic change. Anyway it's real hard to make money at casinos these days. I'd better get some advice here on VCT about the best way to take out a line of credit.

[accountinquestion]

Really grasping at straws are we?

And if someone posts probabilistic nonsense because of a mistaken belief that next hand UX multipliers are generated on the deal and not on the draw so what. It can all just be brushed aside with a "whoops, I made a mistake" followed by a 180 degree topic change. Anyway it's real hard to make money at casinos these days. I'd better get some advice here on VCT about the best way to take out a line of credit.

I knew how UX worked, I just misread the screen. I don't play UX that much and just sorta glanced at it. I'm not always a thorough person when I "check" things.

I didn't make any 180% topic change. I just said I made a mistake and that was that. It wasn't some deeply held belief or anything. It is not really analogous in any sort of way. Just a one time thing from not really inspected a screenshot on a forum. My math was based on that which was also wrong because of my not closely looking at screenshot. I explained what I'd done and moved on. It was really simple to do because mentally I'm not feeble and can readily admit being wrong (And infact I like people correcting me. It means I improve)

I was just wondering about the processes of taking out a marker. Who gives a fuck. Bellagio is fairly incompetent these days btw.

Ok, so you are REALLY REALLY grasping at straws. I believe that is what you're trying to convey in this response, no?

[tableplay]

Ok, so you are REALLY REALLY grasping at straws. I believe that is what you're trying to convey in this response, no?

Yes, you got me - It is much more efficient to write "I am really really grasping at straws" in order to convey that I am really really grasping at straws rather than all that blathering I was doing since the blathering could be interpreted as having some other meaning such as believe everything you are told to believe hook, line and sinker.

[accountinquestion]

Ok, so you are REALLY REALLY grasping at straws. I believe that is what you're trying to convey in this response, no?

Yes, you got me - It is much more efficient to write "I am really really grasping at straws" in order to convey that I am really really grasping at straws rather than all that blathering I was doing since the blathering could be interpreted as having some other meaning such as believe everything you are told to believe hook, line and sinker.

The blathering served a point. That point being that you're nonsensical. I misread a UX screen and did bad math based on that!!! oohhh my!

What is inefficient is telling your little forum buttbuddy thank you everytime he posts any irrelevant video. Why the fuck do you think anyone else cares that you have a need to thank Monet for every video? (even when they demonstrate your view is wrong.)

Yes there is nothing wrong with it. Just very childlike. Maybe you can keep that in private messages? Then you could thank him for every post!

[tableplay]

Ok, so you are REALLY REALLY grasping at straws. I believe that is what you're trying to convey in this response, no?

Yes, you got me - It is much more efficient to write "I am really really grasping at straws" in order to convey that I am really really grasping at straws rather than all that blathering I was doing since the blathering could be interpreted as having some other meaning such as believe everything you are told to believe hook, line and sinker.

The blathering served a point. That point being that you're nonsensical. I misread a UX screen and did bad math based on that!!! oohhh my!

What is inefficient is telling your little forum buttbuddy thank you everytime he posts any irrelevant video. Why the fuck do you think anyone else cares that you have a need to thank Monet for every video? (even when they demonstrate your view is wrong.)

Yes there is nothing wrong with it. Just very childlike. Maybe you can keep that in private messages? Then you could thank him for every post!

I brought up the UX thing to make the general point that you don't look at things in detail. It took 3 posts from me basically spelling out the details before you stopped doubling down on your incorrect beliefs about UX and the probabilities of certain card outcomes. Then when it became clear to you that you were wrong you simply dismissed it as "my bad". You have the expectation that the burden of proof is always on the person who either has a different viewpoint than you or who just wants to present alternate viewpoints than your dogmatic beliefs (Eliot did the same thing - I posted an alternate view point video so that both beliefs were on the table and then he makes all sorts of assumptions about my own beliefs). You expect the other person to do the heavy lifting. Then, when a person is actually stupid enough to provide research and details to you, at a later time you then get back to repeating the same questions that the person already answered so it's actually a waste of time to engage in discussion with you for this reason alone.

[accountinquestion]

Yes, you got me - It is much more efficient to write "I am really really grasping at straws" in order to convey that I am really really grasping at straws rather than all that blathering I was doing since the blathering could be interpreted as having some other meaning such as believe everything you are told to believe hook, line and sinker.

The blathering served a point. That point being that you're nonsensical. I misread a UX screen and did bad math based on that!!! oohhh my!

What is inefficient is telling your little forum buttbuddy thank you everytime he posts any irrelevant video. Why the fuck do you think anyone else cares that you have a need to thank Monet for every video? (even when they demonstrate your view is wrong.)

Yes there is nothing wrong with it. Just very childlike. Maybe you can keep that in private messages? Then you could thank him for every post!

I brought up the UX thing to make the general point that you don't look at things in detail. It took 3 posts from me basically spelling out the details before you stopped doubling down on your incorrect beliefs about UX and the probabilities of certain card outcomes. Then when it became clear to you that you were wrong you simply dismissed it as "my bad". You have the expectation that the burden of proof is always on the person who either has a different viewpoint than you or who just wants to present alternate viewpoints than your dogmatic beliefs (Eliot did the same thing - I posted an alternate view point video so that both beliefs were on the table and then he makes all sorts of assumptions about my own beliefs). You expect the other person to do the heavy lifting. Then, when a person is actually stupid enough to provide research and details to you, at a later time you then get back to repeating the same questions that the person already answered so it's actually a waste of time to engage in discussion with you for this reason alone.

As soon as your pointed out how I was wrong I backed off and admitted I was wrong. Tell me where others have done that? That's because I have integrity. I'm not sure what else you wanted except for me to admit I was wrong? There was nothing more to say. I'm not sure why you think I should have studied a UX screenshot in depth or how that is analogous to a basic belief I have held for decades and read about considerably. But sure brah whatever you say.

Youtube videos of a grifter with a clear political bent (on a non-political issue) is not "research" from anyone who actually sometimes delves into research.

You and Monet didn't even post videos that supported your view. I actually watched them. You google youtube then find a clickbait title + author that seems to fit your view and move on. Then you came at me with the above. Give me a fucking break.

Are you people even for real?

[coach belly]

Eliot did the same thing - I posted an alternate view point video so that both beliefs were on the table and then he makes all sorts of assumptions about my own beliefs.

According to perfesser ditz, it doesn't matter what your intentions were.

That's how readers interpret what you write, so that's what it is.

As per the ditz, Jacobson's assumptions must therefore be what your beliefs actually are.

Anybody who teaches writing would tell you that.