Rather than say lie, how about saying both of them were mistaken?

In all fairness to Rob, he did say he uses "special plays" only 5% of the time, even though he has said he never holds a kicker. One could make the assumption that he was mistaken.

To be honest, this revelation will not make history. Okay, Rob was mistaken in his statement that he never holds kickers. If we accept that I think this particular issue is closed.

But if this particular issue is closed we still have the larger, overriding issue which is this: If only Rob knows what is best playing his methodology, what chance does anyone else have to follow his methodology. After all, until this new revelation about holding kickers I always thought Rob never holds kickers.

And that brings us back to the original discussion: if you have a system or method of play that is so complicated that it can't all be written down for the common man to understand (and heaven knows Rob is not the common man) then can you really call it a workable system or method of play?