Originally Posted by
RS__
Lol Alan talks about expected return but doesn’t realize what EV means.
This became very evident during the January (and on going) EV discussion concerning my blackjack play. Alan doesn't see the connection. If he understood EV, what EV is, or even the meaning of EV, he would....or should. But he doesn't.
Originally Posted by
jbjb
Ya know KJ, I try not to be as harsh on Alan as some are here. I really thought he, of all people, would want to learn legit ways to make money in casinos, even small amounts if necessary. I am now convinced that this isn't the case. He has no grasp on gaming math. He just wishes to be the typical casino sucker just like this guy next to me last night that questioned why my BP was hitting a hard 15 vs 6 up. Some of of are observant and know what to do with the info while others are just stupid and oblivious.
Let's put the EI promo in another light. Suppose for every $400 you ran through a machine you got $40 free play. Would you do it? I would 24/7/365.
I know some members here think I am too hard on Alan. I don't think so. Alan has an agenda to discredit advantage players. He does it every chance he gets. One can only guess that he hates....I mean really is bitter towards players that make money off the casino industry, while he loses.
I don't care that he loses. There are many recreational gamblers that lose money at the casinos and enjoy doing so. Good for them (and us). Personally to me it looks as though Alan has crossed over that line from a recreational gambler enjoying losing a bit of money, to problem gambler losing more than he/she can afford and unable to meet their other financial obligations (debts). That is really none of my business though. That is Slappy's problem.
But I do object to Alan's continuing attempts to discredit advantage players...all advantage players and doing so using completely irrational so called "logic" and alternative universe math, just as I do Alan's partner in this anti-AP agenda, Harry "Rob Singer" Argentino. These are two peas in a pod, in my opinion. Two degenerate gamblers, with an anti-AP agenda, angry and bitter with players that win, when they can't or don't and they make up completely goofy shit, alternative math and facts as part of their agenda.
Alan's "losing control of your money" comment is just as ridiculous as Singer's progression betting overcoming -EV nonsense, or his use of 'stop limits', and goofy talk of "soft profits". It is all nonsense! Alternative reality nonsense. And I don't give someone a pass for not understanding when they are using this complete nonsense to attempt to discredit me or other AP's.